Gail C. Flake, corrupt bribed judge, Dekalb County Court, GA review: remove gail flake from the judiciary system 9

She step down no action taken how is that justice for all the lives she has destroyed.
I know one young man she sent to prison for live there was no evidence against him and the jury had doubts and asked questions that were not answered but was told to judge him on gran activity. He has been fighting the system for 13 years but no one cares that he is innocent or that his two girls lost their dad and this is suppose to be justice.

During a 5 day murder trial, on the 4th day the jury sent out 3 questions from the deliberation room: 1) name of the person who the gun belong to; 2) was anyone else charged in this case; 3) if Johnny and the gang killed Dre (victim) but we don't know if Johnny pulled the trigger is it still murder?

The physical evidence presented during this five day trial, not one points to Johnny and by reading the concerned questions from the jury you can see "DOUBTS".

Judge Gail Flake, response to each jury question: 1) you must rely on your own memories and notes; 2) that is not an issue that is relevant to your consideration in this case; 3) NEW CHARGE TO THE JURY : " Party to a crime". The reading of the party to a crime charge only opened avenues of possible ways a person could commit a crime without physically doing so. That Friday (day 5), after the jury deliberated further on the second day, they came back with the guilty verdict.

Johnny Johnson, ll, was sentenced to serve life plus 5 years in prison on January 26, 2010. He was arrested behind a male friend/Co worker, who had decided to contact DeKalb police with possible information that Johnson told him that he had committed this crime and that Johnson allegedly gave him the murder weapon (380 handgun), on 10-3-08. Johnson's wife, was the second witness against him, she testified to hearing 3 gun shoots (10-2-08) and both witnesses said that Johnson told them that he had shot the victim 3 times. Witness 3 was someone the state found 5 days before trial to help strengthen their case.

The victims body was found on 10-10-08; on 10-11-08 witness one contacted the police; Johnson was arrested after questioning on 10-12-08. No physical evidence used in this case point to Johnson, only what his friend and wife say that he had told them.

On 10-14-08, two of the victims family members (sister/aunt) called MFU police to speak with the detective. According to each caller they had last spoke to the victim on 10-4-08, which would be after state witnesses testified to Johnson allegedly committed this crime. Johnson ask defense counsel to call these two ladies and the detective they spoke with as witnesses... Counsel refused during trial not wanting to wreaking an already weak case case. "THIS EVIDENCE WAS HELD BACK FROM THE JURY AND FROM THE VICTIMS FAMILY".

Evidence did show that Johnson had left his home on 10-2-08, late night, met with his girl friend (also his wife's friend), that they were in a hotel room til evening on 10-4-08.

Motive used in this case was Gang Related, behind witness testimony. Had this case been investigated and not trying to make states job easy by using hearsay, the case probably would have made sense and been solved correctly. The reason why none of the evidence or dates add up in this case and nothing is making sense at all is simple: This case was not investigated and anyone with common sense would first ask themselves in a case like this: "WHY WOULD JOHNSON'S WIFE AND JOHNSON'S FRIEND HAVE HIM ARRESTED FOR ANYTHING AT ALL; HOW COULD TWO PEOPLE THAT HAVE LOVE FOR YOU HAVE YOU ARRESTED FOR ANYTHING; WHAT IS THEIR MOTIVES BEHIND THIS?"

CONCLUSION: Johnson is still in prison fighting every day to make it back home to his two daughters. Not one witness during his trial testified to seeing him commit the crime of murder. Each witness testified to him confessing to committing this crime separately. And each witness testified to Johnson being very upset during this time because he had just found out that his wife was cheating on him with a guy named (?). "WAS THE VICTIM THE PERSON JOHNSON FOUND OUT WAS SLEEPING WITH HIS WIFE, NO, SO WHY WAS THIS OTHER PERSONS NAME MENTIONED DURING A MURDER TRIAL, IF HE OR SHE HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS CASE?"

Gail Flake was well aware of all these things and yet she did whatever she had to do to get an conviction. She is well know inside DeKalb County Jail, as the judge who don't like cases where there's a gun involved. And your being innocent or guilty does not concern her either way.

That women sent my brother to prison for life when the evidence showed there was no way he could’ve committed the crime. He’s been gone 13 years now and we are still trying to get him home.

She was very bad judge her district attorney was fake act like she want through the same thing my court was about .Why will put a person on this case. I’m glad she is going from the system

Flake was the judge in this Georgia Supreme Court case. Just disgusting.

https://law.justia.com/cases/georgia/supreme-court/1996/s95a1805-1.html

FLETCHER, Presiding Justice, concurring in part and dissenting in part.[1]

I have no hesitation concluding that a trial court abuses its discretion when it awards permanent and sole custody of a five-year-old girl to the father who is the subject of an ongoing, active investigation into allegations that he molested that child. The "any evidence" standard is a highly deferential standard. Deference in the face of the extreme decisions of the trial court in this case, however, amounts to an abdication of our responsibility to reverse the trial court when there has been a clear abuse of discretion.

1. Six weeks before the award of custody was made, the trial court heard testimony from a special agent from the North Carolina State Bureau of Investigation who stated that the father was the subject of a criminal investigation into whether he had abused his child when she was in North Carolina for court-ordered visitation. The agent testified that the investigation began in September 1994, was ongoing, and the agent planned to present a case to a grand jury. Additionally, the agent testified that while the mother had first contacted North Carolina authorities in August 1994, she had no role in their continuing investigation. The trial court allowed the agent to testify regarding only the status and not the details of the investigation. Therefore, it cannot be said that the trial court weighed the evidence held by the North Carolina authorities and found it lacking or that the mother's allegations were the sole basis of the investigation.[2]

2. The trial court's disdain for the North Carolina investigation is shown in two other respects.

(a) Prior to entering the final decree and judgment, the trial court issued an order requiring the North Carolina investigatory and social services agencies to seek permission from the trial court before conducting any interviews of the child. A court of this state clearly has no authority to direct authorities in another state who are investigating possible criminal behavior committed within their jurisdiction.[3]

(b) Finally, the trial court actually approved the father's flight from North Carolina with the child to avoid the police. In March 1995, the child was in North Carolina for court-ordered visitation that was to take place "at his home in Asheville, North Carolina." During that visitation, the father and child were in a nearby park when he observed police approaching his house. Believing that the police had a court order to remove the child from his house or an indictment against him, he hid for several hours and sent the child off with neighbors so she would not be found. Then later that night, without informing the child's mother or her counsel, he took the child and the two fled North Carolina. He and the child spent the night on the road, drove to Atlanta, and then took the child to his mother's home in Missouri. Incredibly, following an emergency *583 hearing[4] the trial court validated the father's actions in spiriting the child away under cover of darkness to evade police by placing temporary custody with his relatives in Missouri.

3. While the trial court shut its eyes to an ongoing, active investigation in another state, and approved the father's intentional avoidance of that investigation, it relied on a court-appointed psychiatrist who testified that he spent no more than one hour alone with the child and who was "convinced right off the bat" that there was no abuse when he observed the child and father together in his office.

Evidence of the father's "wholesome family life"[5] cannot overshadow the reality of an ongoing, active criminal investigation. Clearly, the trial court's custody determination was not based on then existing facts, but on the court's hopeful assumption that the father would be cleared. Under these extreme and unusual circumstances, I would find that the trial court abused its discretion and would remand for additional evidence and a new determination of custody.

4. Finally, I cannot agree that the trial court was authorized in its final order to allow custody to shift from the grandmother in Missouri to the father based solely on the father's notification to his relatives that the North Carolina proceedings were over. This court has never before approved a self-executing change of custody based on a parent's unverified assertion that he has been cleared in a child abuse investigation and we should not do so now.

I am authorized to state that Justice HUNSTEIN joins in this partial concurrence and partial dissent.

I agree and I see she has "stepped down"
Judge Flake has made several administrative errors in multiple cases. One being entering a judgment without evidence and also voiding a consent order that was to be in my favor.
I have proof that she acted as a contractor who in turned benefits by granting child support orders.
I am glad someone has brought this to light the past and current corruption allowed to go on in Dekalb County's judiciary system.

Since 1999 to present, there are myriads of publications from the valid sources (like ajc.com) about the Dekalb County Superior Judge Gail C. Flake's amoral nature, her documented corruptions, irrational judgments, her own appearances in the court of law as a defendant (she was judged for tax fraud), and her adultery with a sportsman Robert (Pat) Jarvis - while the latter was married man.

Judge Flake's current husband, Rovert (Pat Jarvis), is a convicted felon, a former sheriff in Dekalb County Courthouse, now occupied with an organic nursery plant in Rutledge, GA.

Judge Gail Flake puts immense of efforts to remove all publications about her disgraced and sinister life. Many of those are removed. Yet the victims of all her misjudgments promise to keep her true face visible for the global web.

Judge Gail Flake must be thrown out from the courthouse. She has no moral and mental capacity to sit as a judge as amorality is grounded in her blood. That makes her protect (cover) the evil, the criminals, against the innocent victims. In many of his judgments she also exhibit child cruelty. Also see