Quora

I am beginning to suspect an undeclared rating-system that is agenda-based programmed into place, designed by those of Quora with the intention of pushing through certain bias opinions of a particlar political, social and moral perspective.

Because it is a website that gains prolific attention, with professionals partly relying on the website as a tool to display their work in whatever subject, in a tough market, it is very important that reviews are fairly moderated.

In more recent months, the picture is stark after having spent a lot of effort trying to forge some way to gaining public attention for specific reasons, only to see that when someone makes a remark that is not 'popular' with a certain mind-set, one's votes go down and noticeably so. By this, I am not trying to point to my own work or say that it is of higher quality than many, or anything like that, but that I have evidence that proves something is rotten behind-the-scenes, and will give four examples...

1. If one speaks of Artificial Intelligence, I as much as anyone else, will gain a minimum limit of a lot of views. That is the first, anything robot-based, is pushed as being of prior importance.

2. I have been trying to gain attention because I am legitimately concerned about people who live in my own area, (in the U. K) and are causing harm and are dug-in criminals, displaying psychopathic tendencies, and instead of gaining attention, as if the blog was full of people really communicating with one another, instead you might get the odd person who is a real user, but for the most part ignored; in other words, most people seem to just be throwing blog-articles onto the websites, possibly highlighting that many profiles are either fake or that the website is being used as a communication tunnel, whereby the attention does not rest with the website but brings some form of profit to the web-owners via the attention or hits that the website brings. On real sites, with real people, there would be attention in response to the things I have outlined.

3. There are questions piling into the main framework that do not sound as if they come from human beings; they sound, rather, as if Artificial Intelligence is being tried and tested on the masses without their knowledge.

4. I recently decided to spend a long time writing a proper review of something of interest - it is not a professional piece of work, yet going by the amount that some people write and seem to gain 'views', would, going by that comparison have equated to about seven or eight times the amount that I got. I actually got very little response in that regard for the time spent. Some might say that it is just the way it worked out, only I had only just spoken of moral concerns that many did not seem to agree with, in a previous discussion. Now, the point here, is that I looked at some other comments in response to the same question to which I had evidently took a lot of time over, to answer, and they received 'upvotes' as well as views - looking at the answer, there is no way that such a response should have received any upvotes or views - it is most clear.

I have written the URL with my name in it, for you to see - my work is the long one with lots of pictures. And in the 'Add Photos/Videos' on your contact-form I have uploaded a print-screen of the answer that did receive votes - the reply does not even specifically answer the question:

https://www.quora.com/What-is-your-favorite-corporate-logo-Why/answer/Philip-Morgan-130

They don't have customer service, just a "help center" set up as a "leave your complaints in the box" design. They limit the number of characters a question can have *including spaces*, AND limit the *limit of characters (if you have 10 characters left, you can't post the question) . They won't notify answerer's if the inquirer has a question, instead, it's just a "comment" option: no reply (is that not intuitive?). It hurts to see such a great platform have so many stupid rules which no one is willing to change.

Please try to spread this to people who can make a change if you agree. This is about the pursuit of knowledge, and confronting companies that refuse to change for the better of the customer.