Wikipedia review: Misleading info

Wikipedia is regarded as an accurate online resource for information. However when I joined wikipedia as a contributor, any good addition regarding Islam and Pakistan were deleted by the other hindu indian contributors. I followed the guidelines and submitted published material but it was unbelievable how wikipedia corrupt staff is racist, fraudulent and liars. They even protect sick controversies against Bollywood actors. I even tried posting a fake hateful acquisition against Islam which was not even touched by these so called moderators. Fictional pictures of religious figures that disturb or disrespect a religion are forbidden on Wikipedia and according to the “rules” you cannot post pictures that were not published as actual images of the person. Have a look at Prophet Muhammad Peace Be Upon Him page where highly disrespectful paintings have been posted when it is a known fact that Islam does not allows drawings that can promote idolism. A group of friends complained and we all were not even given a response. Even when asked how are these disrespectful paintings selected when they are not of the real person but mere drawings of a mentally disturbed person, Wikipedia admin had no answer nor they removed the images.

Secondly Gandhi’s page is more like a novel full of false fantasies to portray him as a saint. When we posted how Gandhi himself declared he made underage girls sleep with him naked which would make him a serious child molester and pedophile, Wikipedia staff blocked our IP from ever creating a new account! Gandhi himself quoted racism against Black people in Africa and he himself quoted highly disturbing incidents including forcing his 15 years old gran niece to sleep and bathe naked with him when he was in his 60s but this published and true information is never allowed by hindus running Wikipedia. On the other hand, their hatred towards Muslims and Pakistan is to an extent that the Founder of Pakistan Muhammad Ali Jinnah’s page even has gossips published as part of his profile. There is no further information allowed when you post how these hindu created controversies were cleared. Example Jinnah’s wife was 16 when she married him. Yes married him as she had a crush on him. She had no education or impressive achievements while Jinnah was highly educated from Oxford, exceptionally intelligent intellectual who founded a whole country at the time when Muslims were massacred in India for believing God instead of animals. Hindus tried to ignore their leader’s disturbing child abuse and focused on Jinnah’s wife age while it was perfectly alright for any one legally marrying after puberty. Many stories were released against Jinnah for marrying a teenager and when Jinnah’s wife herself gave an interview on how she had a crush on Jinnah since she was a kid and has her dream come true that he accepted her when she could legally get married, hindus disposed off that information. When we tried posting this clarification against the allegations posted by Wikipedia corrupt admin, our information was immediately removed even from edits! You can try yourself posting any negative reality of hindu and india from cow's urine being toxic for humans to the horrifying high rates of aids and rapes in India published by hindus themselves, this will be deleted by wikipedia staff within seconds. Same goes for Quora aggressively promoting hatred against Islam and making sure world will never have peace.