Menu
Login
This truthful fair comment privilege opinion based complaint is a matter of public concern related to community well-being, civic engagement, government, and safety. The intent of this truthful civic engagement is to create public awareness about school to prison pipeline, legal abuse, malicious prosecution, conspiracy against rights, deprivation of rights under color of law, community mobbing, discrimination, bullying, unethical utilization of confidential informants, and vigilantism. Additionally, this truthful civic engagement is intended to prevent the aforementioned abuse and viewpoint discrimination from happening again especially in the state of Texas and to promote equal opportunity, due care, and enjoyment and free exercise of all constitutional rights especially the first amendment, due process rights, and the fourteenth amendment equal protection clause.
School to prison pipeline is a societal injustice that involves the discriminatory targeting of minorities utilizing wrongful profiling, unfair snitching or hypocritical confidential informant systems, dog whistle politics, demagoguery, and draconian punishments by authorities and the community. School to prison pipeline is a form of legal abuse known as malicious prosecution which is a dignitary tort that involved injury to my human dignity, lack of probable, malice on the part of the accusers, abuse of process, and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
Regarding a matter of public concern from my viewpoint several years ago I believe that Caitlin Fieszel, Niki Hall (now known as Niki Isenhart), Branden Twist, Kyle McEwen, Scott Kildebeck, Kyle McEwen, and Matt Junell incited a school to prison pipeline, a community mobbing, and a malicious prosecution against me when we were seniors at Frisco High School. Several years ago Caitlin Fieszel, Niki Hall (Niki Isenhart), and others they knew circulated a biased and draconian petition requesting my prosecution which later incited an egregiously unfair federal investigation against me after my high school graduation. I was wrongfully jeered at during my High School graduation ceremony as well because of the smear campaign that Caitlin Fieszel incited. Furthermore, in my honest opinion the community mobbing, alarmism, and fear mongering smear campaign lingered into a few of my workplaces and onto the college campuses that I attended in north Texas causing hostile environments. From my viewpoint as a minority I believe they treated me with discriminatory bias and I believe they wanted to harm me.
I am an innocent ethnic minority and from my viewpoint I believe the pernicious discrimination and sanctimonious community hypocrisy was initiated by Caitlin Fieszel and Branden Twist a few years prior to our graduation ceremony with an insidious covert mobbing involving demagogic rumors, painful physical and verbal bullying, and dog whistle politics which escalated to a frame-up that involved an extremely mysterious crime involving a forest fire that occurred at Plantation Resort neighborhood. Over a period time the pernicious community mobbing escalated to a widespread fear-mongering smear campaign against me that portrayed me out of context as a dangerous criminal and in a false light which incited scorn and unfair investigations from bigots at Frisco High School, in the community, and later by prejudiced federal investigators. Furthermore, shocking false accusations were eventually filed against me to federal investigators and to school officials by Caitlin Fieszel and Branden Twist which nearly led to my false arrest and wrongful conviction. In my honest opinion I believe the false accusations and slander campaign against me became rampant all over the community because of Caitlin Fieszel, Branden Twist, Niki Hall (Niki Isenhart), Matt Junell, and more of their bigoted friends who joined in on the malicious groupthink. From my viewpoint the fear mongering smear campaign that they started inured my reputation and human dignity and exposed me to long-term public hatred, contempt, ridicule, and potential financial injury because of inability to get hired or to sustain work. Additionally, the defamatory character assassination and blacklisting impeached or called into question my honesty, integrity, virtue, and reputation. From my viewpoint I believe that I was treated like a dangerous criminal by many bigots in the community and within Frisco High School even though there wasn't probable cause nor was there a motive on my part. Furthermore, I was not arrested or convicted although I was unfairly investigated by the federal government which caused me emotional distress and mental anguish and in my opinion led to blacklisting.
As a senior about to graduate I was not expelled from Frisco High School yet in my honest opinion I believe that I was victim of several attempts of aggressive mobbings with intent to force me out that involved conflicting messages, physical bullying, harassment, unfair treatment, slander, setups, and bigoted groupthink. Several of those mobbings had been waged against me for a few years prior to my senior year at Frisco High School as well. Regarding a matter of public concern from my viewpoint I believe that I was a victim of conspiracy against rights 18 U.S. Code § 241. Furthermore, from my viewpoint I believe that I suffered a hostile academic environment at Frisco High School because of Caitlin Fieszel, Niki Hall (now known as Niki Isenhart), Branden Twist, Scott Kildebeck, Kyle McEwen, and other bigoted provocateurs that they associated with. From my viewpoint I believe that a few of my teachers at the time Mr. Jim Wirwahn and Karen LeCocq showed favoritism and gave leeway toward such bigots who had perpetuated the defamatory smear campaign against me. From my understanding the aforementioned bigoted colleagues even claimed that I had confessed to a crime in Karen LeCocq's class which was not true. From my viewpoint I did not confess to anything in class nor did I sign a document of confession in the presence of officials. Yet in my honest opinion my bigoted classmates were shown favoritism and were enabled by Karen LeCocq who was our anatomy teacher at the time. From my viewpoint Ms. LeCocq gave Caitlin Fieszel carte blanche to unfairly, hypocritically, and redundantly address her fallacious grievances against me in her class. In my honest opinion I felt that Caitlin Fieszel harassed me repetitively with shocking outbursts of fallacious gish gallop and demagoguery . In my honest opinion Ms. LeCocq enabled Caitlin Fieszel to repetitively interrogate me and to try to coerce a confession or self-incriminating testimony out of me in anatomy class. In my honest opinion I felt that Ms. LeCocq's anatomy and physiology class had been turned into a pernicious kangaroo court that discriminated against me, put me at a severely unfair disadvantage, and deprived me of due care.
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects minorities from discrimination and harassment yet I believe that my rights were repeatedly violated at Frisco High School because of the aforementioned bigoted provocateurs and some boorishly prejudiced teachers that enabled the mobbing. From my viewpoint I believe the aforementioned provocateurs wanted to harm me yet they were shown excessive favoritism by a few teachers which caused the mobbing to escalate. In my honest opinion I believe that I experienced a hostile academic environment. In my honest opinion I believe that I was deprived of due care and the enjoyment and free exercise of my civil rights because of the aforementioned self-righteous hypocrites.
Furthermore, as a matter of public concern related to community well-being from my viewpoint I believe that I was maliciously profiled and my backpack and pockets were repeatedly, unfairly, and prejudicially searched through by my boorish and self-righteous Frisco High School teachers Mr. Jim Wirwahn and Karen LeCocq. In my honest opinion I felt that I was physically attacked in Karen LeCocq's class by Miguel Bautista. Miguel Bautista also threw me up against a locker in the hallway next to Karen LeCocq's classroom. In my honest opinion Karen LeCocq showed favoritism towards Miguel and permitted him to get away with harassing and physically bullying me. While I was being prejudicially profiled by my boorish sanctimonious teachers and other bigots I was physically and verbally abused by several classmates in the hallways and in other classes including Branden Twist, Kyle McEwen, and Eliazar Guzman. Branden Twist sucker punched me in the stomach several times in the hallway which caused me a lot of physical pain. Furthermore, Branden Twist also threatened my life on several occasions. From my viewpoint other bigoted provocateurs that Twist and Fieszel associated with poked me with pens and pencils or threatened to stab me with pens and pencils and they sucker punched me in the arm repeatedly.
From my viewpoint I believed Branden Twist and Caitlin Fieszel wanted to harm me. As a matter of public concern I remember that Caitlin Fieszel incited her bigoted friends to punch me and throw me against lockers at Frisco High School. From my recollection Caitlin Fieszel also incited her bigoted friends to participate in a biased petition that wrongfully demanded my prosecution and to make disorderly noises of disparagement at my graduation ceremony. It was unfortunate that the community mobbing and unfair profiling continued against me while I attended college and when I worked at my first jobs which did not last long.
Regarding a matter of public concern when I tried to report the escalating abuse to the teachers and school leadership they refused to believe me or help me. I did not get to enjoy my due process rights, freedom of speech, or due care. In my honest opinion I received absolutely no due care, empathy, or support from anyone at Frisco High School or from anyone in the community at that time. From my viewpoint I believe there was an egregious lack of due care, a violation of duty of care, and my due process rights were violated.
Furthermore, almost everything that I said and did as a response to the prejudicial profiling and interrogative loaded questions conducted by the aforementioned teachers was unfairly documented and reported to the federal government even though there was no probable cause. From my viewpoint I believe misrepresentations and mischaracterizations were maliciously reported to federal investigators who later did an extremely unfair investigation against me. From my viewpoint I believe I was unfairly treated like a dangerous criminal even though there wasn't probable cause or motive on my part.
Ultimately, I was not arrested nor convicted and I did not have to expunge a record because the prosecutor had insufficient evidence; however, I believe the aforementioned hypocritical bigots attempted to blacklist me in an unconstitutional manner because pending federal cases wrongfully showed up on my federal background check along with unfair misrepresentations and mischaracterizations about me. From my understanding it was noted in my federal background check that others who come into contact with me must ask me the question: "do you want to harm your former classmates who graduated from Frisco High School?" From my viewpoint such a loaded fallacious question is entrapment and defamatory because it calls my reputation into question. In my honest opinion I believe they tried to set me up for further malicious prosecution, legal abuse, and wanted to make me permanently disenfranchised.
Regarding a matter of public concern from my viewpoint I believe that Branden Twist's group of friends namely Caitlin Fieszel, Niki Hall (now known as Niki Isenhart), and Scott Kildebeck continued to incite a fear-mongering smear campaign and unconstitutional blacklisting against me when I attended Collin College and more specifically at The University of North Texas in Denton, Texas. When I lived at Collin College my campus apartment was broken into on several occasions and I was victim of unconstitutional gang stalking surveillance, profiling, and harassment in which an overweight suspicious stranger aggressively tried kicking down my front door and breaking in with a key. When I tried calling the police my cell phone signal was blocked because of a cell phone jammer. At that moment I felt that my life was in danger. Specifically at The University of North Texas from my viewpoint I believe the fear mongering smear campaign that Caitlin Fieszel, Niki Hall (now known as Niki Isenhart), and Scott Kildebeck likely started on campus incited unreasonable suspicion, unfair treatment, and public hatred against me. Once again I was treated like a dangerous criminal with unreasonable suspicion by others. I was lowered in the estimation of the community. Once again I was wrongfully profiled by others on campus. Even a few bigoted professors at The University of North Texas tried to entrap me and set me up by asking me if I wanted to harm my former Frisco High School classmates who were now UNT colleagues. In my honest opinion I believe that I was a victim of gang stalking which is an insidious unconstitutional vigilante based profiling, surveillance, snitching, and harassment program similar to cointelpro which was a psychological warfare program that the federal government used to subjugate minorities, activists, and whistle-blowers.
Regarding a matter of public concern related to community well-being from my viewpoint I believe that the aforementioned bigoted provocateurs may have personality disorders especially narcissistic, anti-social, and paranoid personality disorders. When personality disorders co-occur together in a single person it is known as co-morbidity which is what I honestly believe I had observed. Personality disordered people are known for having lack of empathy, are exploitative, are stubborn, are arrogant, use charm, wit, and charisma to violate the rights of people, have aggression, paranoia, grandiosity, entitlement issues, no remorse, and a disregard for right and wrong.
Addendum to original complaint against Caitlin Fieszel, Branden Oliver Twist, Niki Isenhart (formerly Niki Hall), Frisco ISD employees Jim Wirwahn and Karen LeCocq, and a corrupt female ATF agent from the ATF Dallas Field Division. I am a protected class Hispanic ethnic minority male U.S. citizen (protected by Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title 2, Title 6, and Title 7 from discrimination stare decisis precedent set by Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States, 379 U.S. 241 (1964)). This truthful expression of the first amendment is a fair comment privilege civic engagement complaint (stare decisis precedent set by New York Times Co. v. United States, 403 U.S. 713 1971, and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971)Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law 18 U.S.C. § 242, and 42 U.S. Code § 1983 Civil Action for deprivation of rights under color of law. This fair comment privilege complaint is a matter of public concern bringing to your attention ongoing ATF incited evidence laundering entrapment (Sorrells v. United States, 287 U.S. 435 1932), cyber-stalking entrapment by use of a confidential online federal dossier with my private information on it that has been passed around in the north Texas community under the pretense of national security, and deprivation of rights under color of law incited by a female ATF agent from the ATF Dallas Field Division: Address: 1114 Commerce St Room 303, Dallas, TX 75242 Phone: [protected]. From my viewpoint and research the female ATF agent has wrongfully used citizens in the Dallas, Texas, Plano, Texas, and Frisco, Texas communities to deprive me of my rights, profile me, harass me, abusively play good cop bad cop with me to coerce false confessions, invade my privacy, and to document my distressed reactions and responses on a confidential online federal dossier in the name of national security matters for several years. What has been incited against me over the last several years is malfeasance, abuse of power, abuse of process, malicious prosecution, and parallel construction evidence laundering which are civil rights violation torts. Misinformation and psychological profiling that was collected about me was then used to customize future harassment, interrogation, and psychological warfare gaslighting to make the mental anguish more painful and humiliating. The link to the confidential federal dossier has been passed around in north Texas cities including Denton, Texas at The University of North Texas masquerading as a federal investigation, government surveillance program, and sting operation. They have conspired against my rights (including my Crime Victims Rights Act of 2004, 18 U.S.C. § 3771 and Victims’ Rights and Restitution Act of 1990). Over the years they have collected vulgar misrepresentations about my private life to incite blacklisting and have wrongfully used disinformation about my crotch and body to repeatedly sexually harass me as well. I am innocent, dignified, peaceable, and I have no convictions yet I believe the malicious prosecution entrapment parallel construction abuse of power operation continues onward which is a dignitary tort and a conspiracy against all of my civil rights 18 U.S.C. §242. It is a flagrant miscarriage of justice involving errors of impunity and a malicious disregard for The Attorney General's Guidelines on crime and domestic security investigations. I am an innocent U.S. citizen, there is no probable cause, no motive on my part, and no reasonable factual predicate. What the female ATF agent and those who colluded with her have done is violating precedent set by the U.S. Supreme Court: Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961). Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967) (4th Right To Privacy) The Court extended the Fourth Amendment protection from unreasonable search and seizure to protect individuals with a "reasonable expectation of privacy." Silverman v. United States, 365 U.S. 505 (1961) (4th Right To Privacy) A federal officer may not, without warrant, physically entrench into a person's office or home tosecretly observe or listen and relate at the man's subsequent criminal trial what was seen or heard. United States v. U.S. District Court, 407 U.S. 297 (1972) (4th Right To Privacy) Government officials are obligated to obtain a warrant before beginning electronic surveillance even when domestic security issues are involved. The "inherent vagueness of the domestic security concept" and the potential for abusing it to quell political dissent make the Fourth Amendment protections especially important when the government engaged in spying on its own citizens. Other valuable U.S. Supreme Court precedent includes Rochin v. California, 342 U.S. 165 (1952)The use at trial of evidence obtained by conduct that "shocks the conscience" violates due process. And Manuel v. Joliet, 580 U.S. (2017)a criminal defendant may bring a claim under the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution to challenge pretrial confinement.
Initially conspiratorial false complaints of accessory to arson and witness tampering were maliciously made against me to the female ATF agent and ATF Dallas division by Caitlin Fieszel (who is now a special needs teacher in north Texas at Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD), and Branden Oliver Twist who has a public arrest record, and they wrongfully involved as many people as possible including Frisco ISD employees Jim Wirwahn and Karen LeCocq who maliciously conspired against my student rights at Frisco High School (Title 6 violation) and then documented my distressed reactions on an online federal dossier which continued to be passed around in the North Texas community for many years onward with intent to profile me, to harass me, to wrongfully collect data on me, and to entrap me. Throughout the years the cyber-stalking entrapment smear campaign incited by the female ATF agent, ATF Dallas Division, and U.S. Attorney's Office Eastern District of Texas has caused me financial injury, job loss in the form of constructive discharge and blacklisting, defamation, sexual harassment, and mental anguish (all of which is intentional infliction of emotional distress). I experienced ferocious harassment, setups, and so-called government surveillance at a Frisco, Texas Kroger grocery store and in a Dallas bar in Deep Ellum called Lizard Lounge because of this as well. Even worse the conspiracy against rights 18 U.S. Code § 241 and deprivation of rights under color of law involving cyber-stalking by use of the online confidential dossier has caused me to be wrongfully profiled, investigated, harassed, and entrapped at my jobs by hypocritical management and then to be constructive discharged or to be prejudicially mobbed out of my jobs causing me harm, mental anguish and financial injury. Those jobs include Plano Community Homes (Pioneer Place, East Campus, and West Campus) involving duplicitous supervisors Roque Christensen, Lee Ann Hubank, and Michele Shevlin. And another duplicitous workplace Innovation Builders located in Plano, Texas involving Ange Asplin, Holly Williams, and Adrienne Cocita.
Furthermore a former friend of mine from Frisco, Texas named Susan Danielle Rich has been involved in profiling me and trying to entrap me while using the federal online dossier. Susan Danielle Rich is blatantly deranged, she has a public arrest record for crimes of moral turpitude, and she is an admitted meth addict. Susan Danielle Rich has harassed me through Facebook and is currently residing in Denton, Texas.
Other flagrant hypocrites who may be involved or knowledgeable about this abuse of process malicious prosecution entrapment operation are anyone who graduated with me from Frisco High School in 2001 such as Matt Junell who is now a licensed attorney that graduated from Villanova Law School, Stephen Harper who is now a police officer in Denton, Texas, Niki Isenhart (formerly Niki Hall), Titus Toon (current Tax Managing Director at KPMG), former U.S. Marine Jack Moore, Laura Kilpatrick, Kyle Mcewen, Amanda Williams (formerly Amanda Murphy), and Amanda Welborn (formerly Amanda Roof) who is currently a teacher at Princeton ISD.
Other hypocrites who are likely to have involvement or information about this abuse of process, malicious prosecution, and entrapment operation are: JP Cano of Resource Center Nelson-Tebedo Clinic Dallas, Pastor Gavin Papit, Nicole Bank BCBA Keller, Texas, Lynne Gattis-Cunningham current recruiter for City of Frisco (former Aprima Human Resources Director), Nathan Miller, Dustin Aguilar, and Dr. Shahla Rosales (Professor at University of North Texas).
Regarding a matter of public concern related to community well-being and government from my understanding of what was reported to me by others I believe that a corrupt female federal agent put me in an unconstitutional ongoing federal entrapment sting operation program and created an unconstitutional online portal database with access to my confidential dossier with malicious federal instructions that incited others in the community to profile me, abusively play good cop bad cop with me, to ask repeatedly if I wanted to harm them or others, to demand not to be defamed which censorship, to incite intimidation against my 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th, and 8th amendments (cruel and unusual punishment), to provoke me with shocking harassment regarding my private life, to interrogate me with malicious loaded questions that called my good reputation into question and lowered me in the estimation of the community, and then to entrap me by stating they would call the police and that I was not allowed to leave the vicinity which is false imprisonment and a violation of the 13th. They have continued to try to coerce confessions out of me in the community in the name of national security and in the name of the ATF agent which violates all of my due process rights and is a violation of the 8th amendment (cruel and unusual punishment). All hearsay evidence they collect is false, forged, tainted and or contaminated which if taken to court will be suppressed with a motion in limine or motion to strike for irrelevance (rule 402) or for unfair prejudice and wasting time (exclusionary rule 403). All information about this type of unconstitutional federal abuse of process entrapment evidence laundering parallel construction operation should be investigated and corrective action should be made immediately to clear my name. The abuse of process entrapment operation in question should stop immediately, the online federal dossier should close immediately, those involved in cyber-stalking me for the ATF should be notified that this abusive operation has ceased, I should receive restitution, and charges should be brought up against those who have committed malfeasance, conspiracy, and misconduct.
Information about the aforementioned abuse of power needs to be reported to ATF Internal Affairs, Assistant Attorney General Civil Rights Division Criminal Section [protected] or [protected]. [protected]. Askcrt@usdoj.gov, and to U.S. Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General Investigations Division OIG Hotline.
Moore et al. v. Dempsey, 261 U.S. 86 (1923), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled 6-2 that the defendants' mob-dominated trials deprived them of due process guaranteed by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Mob-dominated trials were a violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Federal courts were furthermore duty-bound to review habeas corpus petitions that raised claims of discrimination in state trials, and to order the release of unfairly convicted defendants if the alleged violations were found to be true.
Chambers v. Florida, 309 U.S. 227 (1940), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case that dealt with the extent that police pressure resulting in a criminal defendant's confession violates the Due
Process clause. Confessions compelled by police through duress are inadmissible at trial. Justice Hugo Black delivered the opinion that the due process clause was intended to guarantee adequate and
appropriate procedural standards and to protect, at all times, people charged with or suspected of crime. The rights and liberties of people suspected of crime cannot safely be left to secret processes. Those
who have suffered most from these secret and dictatorial processes have always been the poor, the ignorant, the weak, and the powerless. The Fourteenth Amendment required states to conform to fundamental standards of procedure. The law enforcement methods such as those described in this case are not necessary to uphold our laws. The Constitution prohibits such lawless means regardless of the end in view. The Court went beyond physical coercion to hold that psychological coercion also violates the due process clause, which binds the states. The Court ruled in favor of the defendants, and overturned their convictions. The court found that on the facts admitted by the police and sheriff's officers, the confessions had clearly been compelled and were therefore inadmissible. It marked one of the first times that the court had accepted the contention that treatment short of physical violence should result in the suppression of evidence. Resource: Essential Supreme Court Decisions Seventeenth Edition by John R. Vile. Pg. 404. 2018.
United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 (1974). (The Supreme Court does have the final voice in determining constitutional questions; no person, not even the president of the United States, is completely above the law; and the president cannot use executive privilege as an excuse to withhold evidence that is "demonstrably relevant in a criminal trial).
Elhady v. Kable 2019 federal court ruled federal terrorist watchlist and terrorist database unconstitutional. American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) have documented the devastating consequences regarding unfair government watchlists in an article entitled U.S. Government Watchlisting: Unfair Process and Devastating
Consequences. The Guardian published a research article entitled How The US's terrorism watchlists work - and how you could end up on one?
The book Police State: How America's Cops Get Away With Murder authored by Ruby Ridge standoff court case defense attorney Gerry Spence thoroughly explicates about these important matters of public concern related to community well-being and government. U.S. v Weaver and Harris Idaho Fed. District Ct Ruby Ridge (wrongdoing by ATF and federal law enforcement led to $3.1 million settlement). Mayfield v. United States, 504 F. Supp. 2d 1023 (D. Or. 2007) (Federal government owed compensatory damages of $2 million for using wrong fingerprints evidence to falsely imprison Mayfield).
Book, document, and resource reference:
The Frank Church Committee documents exposing COINTELPRO abuse: https://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/investigations/ChurchCommittee.htm
US: Secret Evidence Erodes Fair Trial Rights: Government Hides Investigative Methods from Accused by Human Rights Watch.
Dark Side Secret Origins of Evidence in US Criminal Cases by Human Rights Watch and Sarah St.Vincent.
In Time for the Reform Debate, New Documents Shed Light on the Government’s Surveillance of Americans by Ashley Gorski, Staff Attorney, ACLU National Security Project.
Disrupt, Discredit, and Divide: How the New FBI Damages Democracy by former FBI Agent Mike German.
The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness by Attorney Michelle Alexander.
Hate Crimes in Cyberspace Reprint Edition by Danielle Keats Citron.
A Government of Wolves: The Emerging American Police State by Attorney John W. Whitehead.
Without Conscience: The Disturbing World of the Psychopaths Among Us by Dr. Robert D. Hare.
Dangerous Personalities: An FBI Profiler Shows You How to Identify and Protect Yourself from Harmful People by Joe Navarro.
Just Mercy: A Story of Justice and Redemption by Attorney Bryan Stevenson (Equal Justice Initiative).