Department of Justice Press Release
For Immediate Release
August 31, 2009 United States Attorney's Office
Southern District of Indiana
Contact: [protected]
Brian Scott Hockett Sentenced to 18 Months for Bank Fraud
INDIANAPOLIS—Brian Scott Hockett, 45, New Palestine, Indiana was sentenced to 18 months in prison today by U.S. District Judge Sarah Evans Barker following his guilty plea to bank fraud, announced Timothy M. Morrison, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Indiana. This case was the result of a three year investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
Brian “Scott” Hockett was the owner of an auto service in Indianapolis known as Fleetmax. In 2002, Hockett set up a line of credit that was shared equally with Fifth Third and National City banks. The line of credit was essentially a floor-plan type arrangement, where the credit was only to be used for “working capital” and it was secured by all the assets of Fleetmax. Because of Fleetmax’s precarious position, the arrangement required monthly reports called “borrowing base certificates” that showed the amount of collateral available as security, and also mandated regular audits by the banks. The line of credit was set up as a “sweep” type account that was tied directly to the primary Fleetmax operating account. As expenses were paid from the operating account, the line of credit would automatically be debited, and the operating account credited, whenever there were not enough funds from business operations in the operating account to pay for the expenses.
From 2002 through the demise of the business around May 2006, the entire line of credit was exhausted, leaving a debt of approximately $10 million. The business was sold in the summer of 2008 for approximately $5 million, leaving a net debt for Hockett on the line of credit of approximately $5 million.
By January 2005, Hockett was aware, from his role as owner of Fleetmax, accounting records provided to him and discussions with Fleetmax staff, that Fleetmax had become entirely dependent on the line of credit for operating capital. In other words, Fleetmax was not generating enough revenue from its own business to operate, and virtually all expenses of the business, and personal expenses of Hockett’s paid for from the Fleetmax operating account, were funded by the line of credit.
From January 2005 through May 2006, Hockett directed and authorized expenses from the Fleetmax operating account of approximately $2, 498, 855 for the purchase of stock in a public company not related to the purposes intended by the line of credit, knowing that these expenses were being paid for by the line of credit, contrary to the terms of the line of credit.
According to Assistant U.S. Attorney Winfield D. Ong, who prosecuted the case for the government, Judge Barker also imposed four years supervised release and 96 hours of community service in the first year of supervised release, following Hockett’s release from prison. During the period of supervised release, Hockett must undergo drug testing. Hockett was ordered to make restitution in the amount of $2, 498, 855.
The complaint has been investigated and resolved to the customer’s satisfaction.
I know Mr. Hockett. I knew him before he had money, when he earned more money than I will have in my lifetime, and when he lost it all paying the banks back all but $1.2 Million from the original debt of more than $7M. He did not file bankruptcy or write a single bad check. He lied to the banks and admitted it. He hurt his wife, children, siblings, and parents also. I was in the courtroom when he was sentenced and his entire family was there and so were his friends. The judge read more than 75 letters the day before the sentencing and even asked Mr. Hockett to identify some of the people in the court room because she was moved by many of the letters.
Scott knows his wrong and admitted it. He became a fraud but has changed by Gods grace and power. His close family members and business associates have collectively supported him through this difficult process. He was a good man before he chose the wrong road and it was painful to watch him digress and turn his heart from others to himself. He is a at peace today and focused on paying off his balance with the banks and making a comeback in business.
This man is still a fraud!
I strongly disagree. In fact, I know him and I met him when I purchased a vehicle from him recently. He was very helpful throughout the process and even after the purchase. He I nvited me to a men's group that he attends and I must say it has been tremendous benefit to my life. I believe that we all have a tendency to be a "fraud". He that is perfect cast the first stone. Furthermore, I believe everyone that is accused should be accused publicly and without anonymity. If your thoughts are sincere, have you challenged him to his face or person to person? Don't you think that would be best for him and for you?