FoxNews
reviews and complaints

Recently, I decided to tune into cable news to stay updated on the situation in Ukraine. As a satellite service user, the options were CNN, MSNBC, a few news outlets that I was not well acquainted with and Fox News. Being familiar with Fox, I decided to give it a go. However, I was deeply disturbed and taken aback by what I saw and heard on the channel. Instead of just reporting news, the Fox News anchors were providing a one-sided narrative that was heavily biased; they were not only distorting the truth but also spewing their opinions with extreme anger and hostility.

As someone who has always been an independent voter, I am someone who seeks to look at all sides of an issue before making a decision. I believe that if someone uses words like "never" or "always" to describe a person or group, they are automatically dismissing facts and are only expressing their opinion. Fair-minded individuals will tell you that the truth usually lies somewhere in the middle of opposing viewpoints. This, unfortunately, is not what I have seen reflected on Fox News. Rather than promoting a balanced view, their coverage is divisive, promotes hostility and often crosses the line into spreading deceitful propaganda.

What's concerning is that these views promoted by Fox News are not just on the airwaves, but are also being promoted by those in power. In our current American climate, we are witnessing a troubling trend of people unwilling to listen to all sides of a story and instead engage in heated arguments, often without any respect for one's views or disagreements. This kind of behavior is not productive for a democratic society and is why it is especially incumbent upon news organizations to provide balanced and well-researched coverage. In light of the current divisive climate, the Fox News brand has perhaps created an atmosphere of "ignorance is bliss". This is not only a travesty but a distress signal for the future of our country.

It is disconcerting and unfortunate that Fox News is supporting and spewing such opinions and words through their media platform. While we must respect the freedom of speech, with freedom comes responsibility. In summary, the grossly biased narrative coming from Fox News is shameful and cannot be tolerated in a democratic society.

It's no secret that FoxNews has a largely conservative leaning, but their coverage of politics and current events is nonetheless informative and worth watching...with one exception. The presence of "political analyst" Juan Williams has become a thorn in the side of many loyal Fox viewers due to his lack of competency, bias, and tendency to present made up facts as truth. At times, his contributions to broadcasts can be downright cringe-worthy.

During a recent appearance on The Story with Martha MacCallum, Williams found himself in hot water when he attempted to defend former President Obama in light of allegations of impeachment-worthy offenses. When Karl Rove pointed out that Obama had made comments to the Russian president that were clear violations of national security, Williams attempted to argue that Obama was actually acting in the nation's best interest. His lies and bias were so egregious that even the other panelists were taken aback, with Rove needing to give Williams a history lesson on Russia and Ukraine in order to correct him.

This is not the first time that Williams has appeared ignorant, biased, or even emotionally unstable on Fox broadcasts. This raises the question of why FoxNews continues to identify him as a political analyst, when his contributions to broadcasts often do more harm than good. Many Fox viewers have called for Williams to be terminated, arguing that he belongs with the mainstream media rather than fitting into Fox's fair and balanced model.

In the end, what sets FoxNews apart from other mainstream news outlets is not the slant of their coverage, but their commitment to presenting the facts as they are, without spin or bias. Juan Williams simply does not fit into this equation, and it's time for Fox to find other voices to represent their conservative perspective.

The review of FoxNews (foxnews.com) initially highlights that most of its content constitutes opinions. While the reviewer may identify as a registered Republican, they also acknowledge that not everything has to be divided into stark binaries such as white versus black. The reviewer encourages individuals to listen to different perspectives.

However, the main issue with Fox "news" is that it appears to have little interest in reporting actual news. The reviewer compares this to the annoyance of MTV not playing music or Comedy Central not being funny anymore. Essentially, if you're going to call yourself a news source, then report on the news. FoxNews appears to be dominated by opinionated content that is passed off as "truth" or "facts."

Due to this, the reviewer no longer watches FoxNews, as well as other mainstream news channels such as MSNBC. Instead, they choose to read news from various sources, and then form their opinions. The reviewer does acknowledge that opinions can be subjective and that most of the time, they may not align with what everyone else may think. However, facts are facts, and they cannot be disputed.

The issue, according to the reviewer, is that FoxNews blurs the lines between facts and opinions. They suggest that FoxNews should dedicate an hour or two a day to opinionated content while making it clear that it's an opinion show. Other than that, give us the facts.

In summary, the review likens FoxNews to a McDonald's hamburger, which, while satisfying in the moment, is hardly nutritious. FoxNews may satisfy viewers who want opinionated content, but those who are looking for genuine news may find themselves disappointed.

When it comes to FoxNews, my feelings are mixed. Sometimes, I find that they provide interesting and insightful reporting that gives me a new perspective on current events. However, I have to admit that for the most part, this network seems to be nothing more than a mouthpiece for the Republican party. As someone who identifies as center-left politically, I find that their views and opinions on many issues do not align with my own.

One of the things that I struggle with when it comes to FoxNews is their treatment of the Constitution. While I believe that it contains some enduring principles that are important to our democracy, I think that it is also a living document that needs to be updated to reflect the changing times. Unfortunately, FoxNews often seems to espouse a view that views any changes to the Constitution as sacrosanct. I find this attitude to be flawed and short-sighted.

Additionally, I have long been wary of the motives of the people behind FoxNews. As a major part of the larger NewsCorp empire owned by the Murdoch family, I see this network as yet another outlet for their tabloid-style approach to journalism. While I can find some entertainment value in this sort of thing when it comes to celebrity gossip, I don't think that it belongs in credible news reporting.

What troubles me most about FoxNews, however, is the fact that they are one of the major national news networks. For many people who don't have the time, money, or inclination to subscribe to sources of news outside of the mainstream, FoxNews is the only place they get their information. And that is a real problem, because the reporting on this network is often far from balanced or objective. Again, I recognize that different news sources have different audiences and agendas. But for a major network like Fox, I think it's important that they strive for a more moderate, neutral approach to their reporting.

Ultimately, what we all should be concerned about when it comes to the media is fairness and equality. No matter what your political beliefs are, these are constitutional values that we all should hold dear. And unfortunately, when it comes to issues like gerrymandering, gun violence, and animal rights, FoxNews often seems to ignore or downplay the voices and needs of those who are most vulnerable. This is unacceptable, and we all need to be better.

The issue of fair and balanced reporting within the U.S. media landscape has long been a subject of debate and concern. In particular, the once-respected Fox News has come under increasing scrutiny for what many see as a clear ideological and political bias that clouds its reporting and commentary on a wide range of topics.

Recent events have brought this issue into even sharper relief, as the network has taken a vehemently anti-mask stance that many experts feel is misinformed and potentially damaging. Despite mounting evidence that masks are a critical tool in reducing the spread of COVID-19, Fox News has consistently downplayed their importance and even ridiculed those who advocate for their use.

This is particularly troubling given the current state of the pandemic in the United States, which has seen a resurgence of cases and hospitalizations in many parts of the country. As some healthcare workers and administrators have noted, there is a clear correlation between mask usage and decreases in transmission rates.

One such administrator, who oversees a group of specialty clinics, has repeatedly seen this correlation firsthand. Their experiences have shown that unmasked individuals, regardless of vaccination status, are far more likely to contract and spread the virus than those who wear masks regularly. It's a testament to the efficacy of this simple preventative measure, yet one that Fox News continues to minimize and dismiss.

This is especially concerning when we consider how things might have been different if leaders like Texas Governor Abbott had taken a more responsible approach to the pandemic. Had they encouraged vaccinations alongside continued mask usage and limitations on large gatherings, the current surge in cases might have been avoided altogether.

Instead, Fox News has consistently promoted an anti-mask agenda that is devoid of credible statistics, medical, and scientific backing. There is a clear need for more balanced and objective news coverage that is anchored in fact rather than politicking or sensationalism.

At the end of the day, it's up to each of us to seek out diverse perspectives and form educated opinions. But it would be a much easier task if news outlets like Fox News would take their responsibility to inform the public more seriously. We are all at risk from COVID-19, regardless of our vaccination status, and we need more nuanced, depoliticized, and evidence-based reporting to help us make informed decisions.

The year 2020 has been a tumultuous one for the United States. From the impeachment of President Trump earlier in the year to the sweeping effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, the country has faced countless challenges. Amidst this chaos, many people have turned to the news for information and guidance. One popular source of news is FoxNews.com, a website that has traditionally been known for its conservative perspective.

However, for some, the way Fox News has covered certain events over the past year has been disappointing. For example, during the 2020 Presidential election, some viewers felt that Fox News was unfair to President Trump and favored his Democratic opponent, Joe Biden. This frustration reached a boiling point on election night when Fox News called the state of Arizona for Biden, even though many ballots had yet to be counted.

For many viewers, this move was seen as a betrayal of conservative values and a turning point for Fox News. Some have even begun looking for other news sources, like Newsmax, to get their information.

Despite this disappointment, many people still hold out hope for the future. They believe that the United States is a strong and resilient nation, and that it will overcome any challenges that come its way. However, it is clear that there is a deep divide in the country right now, and that healing will take time and effort from everyone involved. Only time will tell what the future holds for Fox News and for the United States as a whole.

I am deeply troubled by the recent developments at Fox News, specifically in regards to the biased reporting of Shepard Smith. As a viewer, I have always appreciated the network's commitment to fair and balanced journalism, but this no longer seems to be the case. It is evident that Smith has a clear political agenda that he is overtly pushing, and this has been reflected in his recent coverage of President Trump.

While it is understandable that not everyone agrees with the president's policies, the level of disdain that Smith displays seems to go beyond reasonable disagreement. His snide comments and illogical reactions are unbecoming of a respected journalist. It is disappointing to see that Fox News has allowed this biased reporting to continue, despite it being in direct contradiction to their commitment to fair and balanced coverage.

It is troubling to see these developments, particularly given Fox News' reputation as a trusted source of news for conservatives. The recent changes at the network, including the liberal ownership, raise concerns about the direction that the media is headed in this country. As a member of the public, it is important that I have access to unbiased information, and networks such as Fox News play a crucial role in that regard.

Unfortunately, it seems that this commitment to unbiased reporting is being eroded, and Shepard Smith's reporting is only one example of this troubling trend. It is my hope that Fox News will recommit to its founding principles and return to a fair and balanced approach to journalism that serves the interests of all Americans. Until then, I will be seeking my news from other sources that I can trust to provide unbiased coverage of events.

The review of FoxNews on foxnews.com is not painting a pretty picture. The writer is clearly frustrated and disappointed with the new website's format and content. Instead of feeling like they are reading a newspaper, they now feel like they are using toilet paper. The writer believes that the news is inane and non-existent.

The writer also has a few suggestions for FoxNews to improve their site. Firstly, they suggest going to see the originator of the old website and begging them to come back to restore the old format. Secondly, they recommend firing the current team responsible for the site, who they describe as being pimply-faced, hubristic, historically uneducated, millennial skinny jean-wearing Google worshippers. They suggest taking these individuals to a bar to get them drunk, stealing their wallets and phones, driving away, and then hiring back those who make it into the office on time the next day. These individuals should then be given mailroom jobs and work their way up the ladder in the company for years before being fired to build character.

The writer believes that by following this plan, FoxNews will save its website and that their "eyeballs" will skyrocket. They suggest that FoxNews should craft a story about how they saved the website and post it on their now worthless site, but two or three times with terrible misspellings and bad redirects. The writer believes that this will allow FoxNews to keep their jobs and remain relevant in the market.

Overall, this review is harsh and critical of FoxNews. It is clear that the writer has a deep-rooted frustration with the website's new format and content. They provide suggestions for improvement that are not constructive and rather unrealistic. It is unlikely that FoxNews will take these recommendations and implement them, but they should take note of the writer's feedback and make changes where they can to improve their website.

Fox News Network, which was once the go-to channel for unbiased reporting, now seems to be losing its luster. There have been a multitude of allegations of sexual harassment from a wide range of anchors, which cannot be ignored. What used to be considered the epitome of journalism with the motto of "Fair and Balanced" seems to have taken a sharp turn in another direction, and it is not settling well with their viewers.

One of the most popular shows on Fox News was Greta Van Susteren's show - she always seemed to embody the "Fair and Balanced" mantra that was once the hallmark of the brand. However, with the change to "we report, you decide", there seems to have been a shift to the left, rather than impartiality. This change doesn't resonate well with viewers, and many feel like they no longer belong when viewing Fox News.

The program host Shepard Smith is a perfect example of the perceived shift to the left. Many viewers never tune into his show because they can expect comments that are overly liberal leaning. If one wanted that kind of coverage, they could find it on NBC, CBS, ABC, or CNN. That level of bias does not speak to "Fair and Balanced" journalism, which is what many Fox News viewers look for in a news outlet.

Bill O'Reilly's program was another leading attraction, but there has been a noticeable change in the tone of his program, which has caused viewers to lose interest. In particular, he seems to display a specific bias in his coverage and topics, which many viewers do not agree with.

Another anchor, Megyn Kelly, has also become a lightning rod for controversy. Her bias against Donald Trump is apparent, which has resulted in many of her shows turning into anti-Trump bashing sessions. If viewers wanted that coverage, there are many other channels that can provide it. However, viewers want fair and equal reporting, and the fact that Kelly does not display the same vigor for Hillary Clinton has not gone unnoticed.

Andrea Tantaros, who was also a favorite, has been inexplicably removed from the air. Many viewers feel that her views and commentary added to the network's appeal, and her absence has dampened the enthusiasm of popular shows like The Five and Outnumbered.

In summary, Fox News has lost its former "sparkle" for many viewers. Shows that once were a draw are now being avoided, as they are promoting an unfair, biased narrative that goes beyond simple reporting. Losing Gretta Van Susteren was the breaking point for some viewers, and many now feel that Fox News needs to do some serious soul-searching to reclaim the glory of its past.

When it comes to Fox News, there are often accusations of racism against the network - but those claims cannot be further from the truth. The network features a broad range of anchors and reporters from diverse backgrounds, including many black journalists who have their own shows. While some of the shows are hosted by blonde women who may come across as snooty, it's unfair to say that they were only hired for their appearance - they have talent too.

My personal favorite Fox News anchors include Shepard Smith, who was the lead anchor for a time, and Chris Wallace, who is regularly featured on Fox Broadcast Stations. Brit Hume is also a talented anchor, though he is semi-retired now and was perhaps too old when he first joined Fox. Greta Van Susteren is one of the most professional women on the network, and Judge Jeanine Pirro is perfect for Fox News, especially with her weekend programme. While some may complain that Judge Pirro's court show was inappropriate for legal arbitration, it's great to see her giving speeches on Fox News now. Harris Faulkner is another talented black journalist on the network and can be seen six days a week. Neil Cavuto, who also has a show on Fox News, is someone I always thought of as a Fox Business Network guy, but his show also appears on Fox Broadcast Stations.

Unfortunately, there are some more annoying anchors on Fox News, mostly blonde women who don't really need to be there. Megyn Kelly can be a bit grating, though she's not an outright racist at least. Hannity often has black guests on his show to talk about issues that divide the black community - while some may find it frustrating to watch, it's still better than having no discussion at all. Bill O'Reilly can be good sometimes, but he can also be incredibly rude. Greg Gutfield is hands-down the worst anchor on Fox News - while Hannity may deny Democrats' allegations against Republicans, Gutfield defends every outrageous conservative value.

All in all, Fox News appears to be the least biased when compared to other news networks. However, there are still some improvements that could be made. It would be great to see Fox Report return to nightly programming - there was no need to cancel a programme to make room for "The Kelly File". It doesn't matter who hosts it - Shepard Smith, Julie Banderas, Harris Faulkner, Jeanine Pirro, Greta Van Susteren or even Sarah Palin - but adding someone to the weeknight version of Fox Report would be an excellent idea.

As a human being who values the importance of accurate and unbiased news reporting, I cannot help but share my thoughts on Fox News. While I understand that a tv show may have its own opinions and commentary, it should not come at the cost of manipulating and influencing its viewers to all believe the same ideology. News reporting should be fair, balanced, and free from any politically motivated agenda.

Unfortunately, in my experience with watching Fox News, I have found that this is not a priority for them. Instead, they seem more interested in bashing Democrats and promoting their own brand of propaganda. While there is nothing inherently wrong with taking a political stance, it becomes concerning when it is masked as legitimate news coverage.

When the situation in Libya was taking place, Fox News chose to air shows that were mainly Democratic-focused, and this was a disservice to their viewers. It begged the question, where is the Walter Cronkite of our time? A journalist who could deliver unbiased news coverage and keep us informed on important issues.

It is not about Fox News bashing Democrats or any political party for that matter. It is about them being truthful with their reporting, regardless of where it places them on the political spectrum. Allowing their viewers the right to form their own opinions based on accurate news reporting would be invaluable.

As a viewer, I want news channels to deliver the truth and let me form my own views based on that. CNN, in my opinion, seems to be the only cable news network that offers this approach. It is essential to be aware of the news and understand what is going on in our world, and I hope that all news sources remember the importance of this responsibility.

Upon visiting Fox News' website, I stumbled across a fervent review from someone who had some strong opinions about one of the network's journalists, Chris Wallace. The reviewer expressed a desire for more neutrality from Wallace, lamenting the journalist's perceived biases against the current administration and the President of the United States. While acknowledging Ambassador Y's recent testimony, the reviewer felt that Wallace was too heavily opinionated and needed to "get a grip into reality." The reviewer also took issue with recent stories about Senator Quigley, opining that they were trivial in comparison to true tragedies such as those faced by soldiers, the terminally ill, and those living in poverty. While the reviewer's passion and opinions were certainly intense, they seemed to be rooted in a belief that journalism should be objective and fair, and that Fox News may be falling short in that regard.

As an American citizen who values fair and unbiased journalism, I have to say that my recent experience with Fox News has left me feeling extremely disappointed. In particular, I was left feeling frustrated by the recent performance of Chris Wallace. As the moderator for the 1st Presidential debate, Wallace had a crucial role to play in helping Americans understand the policy differences between the two candidates and how they would run the country if elected. However, instead of asking fair, impartial questions, Wallace seemed more interested in debating with President Trump, and holding him accountable for his answers.

While I understand the importance of challenging our leaders and holding them responsible for their actions, I was disappointed by the lack of balance in the questions posed to the candidates. Instead of allowing both Trump and Biden to present their respective agendas, Wallace seemed intent on pushing his own viewpoints and opinions. When it came to questioning Biden, he only seemed to ask about the Green Deal, which left many Americans wondering what other policies Biden would implement if elected.

One of the concerns I have from the debate is that it seemed as though Biden plans to shut down all of our oil refineries, coal mines and natural gas exploration in favour of electric vehicles. This does not bode well for our country as we may become reliant on other countries for fossil fuels while crippling our energy independence. I believe this needs to be discussed further in detail and not glossed over in a single debate.

In summary, I was disappointed by Fox News' coverage of the Presidential debate. I expect more from journalists who are supposed to bring us the truth and not stir up their own opinions and viewpoints. Hopefully, moving forward, Fox News will provide honest and impartial reporting on the issues that matter to our country, and allow us to make informed decisions about our leaders and our future.

It is disappointing to see the lack of impartiality and professionalism displayed by Chris Wallace on FoxNews. As a news anchor, it is crucial to remain non-partisan in one's delivery in order to provide accurate and unbiased reporting to the public. It can be frustrating to see personal biases and pro-democratic views influencing the coverage of news events.

Many individuals turn to news outlets to stay informed on current events at home and abroad. It is essential that news anchors are hired based on their ability to provide fair and unbiased reporting to the public. In fact, some individuals find better coverage of news events through international news sources like the BBC.

Recently, Wallace has come under fire for asking Kelly Ann Conway about her personal life and marriage in relation to her views on President Trump. This type of questioning is unprofessional and can be irritating to viewers who are looking for unbiased coverage of news events.

It is important to note that the desire for unbiased news reporting is not limited to those who support President Trump. As an American citizen, unbiased news reporting is necessary to make informed decisions and draw fair conclusions about political events. It is possible to reject biases and personal opinions while still recognizing and acknowledging the inappropriate behavior of our political leaders.

Ultimately, what viewers want is unbiased news coverage, not the personal opinions of news anchors. Let us hope that news outlets will prioritize hiring news anchors who can deliver non-partisan news reporting.

As someone who has followed Fox News for an extended period, I can confidently say that the news division of the channel is relatively unbiased, which is commendable. However, I cannot overlook the troubling sexual harassment issues that have plagued the network, despite their recent attempts to confront it.

Unfortunately, some of the programming on the channel has also taken a hit. The Specialist, in particular, is now in shambles following the departure of Eric Bolling, and new host Kat Timpf doesn't appear to possess the requisite knowledge or experience for the role. Additionally, Eboni Williams' presence has further eroded any illusion of objectivity on the show.

While I admire some of Fox News' hosts, such as Sean Hannity and Tucker Carlson, there are others who leave much to be desired. Shepard Smith, for instance, has become unwatchable in my opinion. Not only is his program lacking in substance, but I find it difficult to take him seriously given his obvious use of cosmetic enhancements. Furthermore, it's concerning to hear allegations of sexual harassment involving him and his subordinate.

Unfortunately, Fox News is not alone in its failings. The media landscape as a whole is plagued by bias and corruption, particularly on TV and cable news outlets. Even respected sources such as the BBC have come under scrutiny for their reporting practices. It's frustrating to sift through countless sources to find a modicum of truth, but at this point, it's necessary.

The Four show on FoxNews has recently been reviewed by a human being as being heavily biased towards the conservative party and promoting Donald Trump regardless of his actions, with the exception of one lone liberal who is often outnumbered by the other hosts. The review goes on to criticize the male hosts for being arrogant and lacking journalistic experience, ultimately resulting in a show that is not informative or intellectual in any way. Describing the show as "dirty" and "nasty" with hosts that are "crude," the reviewer hopes for the show's cancellation. Despite the lack of substance in this show, the reviewer notes the past presence of media giants and wonders where today's true journalists have gone. In conclusion, the review is a scathing commentary on The Four and suggests that the hosts may not have promising futures as journalists.

Recently, I had the opportunity to watch Fox News' The Five, and I must say, I was quite disappointed. As a former viewer of the show at an earlier time slot, I was curious to see how it now runs, and to put it bluntly, it was not a pleasant experience. While Greg Gutfeld was quite the beacon of sanity, there were noticeable issues with the rest of the panel.

Dana Perino, in particular, appeared to be quite drained and frazzled. It was as though she had little to contribute, except maybe a summary of some of the more negative things said by liberal networks. On the other hand, Jesse Waters was middling in his performance, while Kimberly Guilfoyle largely repeated the same pre-scripted ten sentences. To be honest, it was hard to focus on her words, as she came off as excessively self-promoting and annoying.

But the worst part of the show was Juan Williams. As soon as he began to speak, I immediately changed the channel over to PBS. That's how unimpressive he is. I used to count on Dana Perino to provide a level of balance to the often extreme opinions on either side of the political divide. Yet it seems that in recent years, she has shifted more towards the left.

It's a shame that Fox News, which was once one of the best news networks around, has declined so much lately. I used to trust them to provide me with balanced and impartial news reporting. But those days seem to be gone forever. When I saw Chris Wallace arguing with Jay Sekulow about the meaning of words, it was the straw that broke the camel's back. Wallace immediately jumped on the negative interpretation of the words and chewed it to death. It's just so sad to see such a decline in quality from a network that once produced excellent reporting with integrity and impartiality.

Overall, what I want from a news network is fair and balanced reporting. Sadly, Fox News doesn't seem to provide this anymore. I hope that someday a network will come along that presents news in an unbiased way, but for now, I'll be looking elsewhere.

Upon conducting a comparative analysis between Fox News and other news stations, namely National Public Radio, the findings reveal that Fox News broadcasts a plethora of lies and manipulative rhetoric, with the sole intention of evoking strong emotional responses from viewers. In fact, the news station has been found to be replete with fabrications by several lawsuits, which they have won based on their argument that they do not have to follow credibility and ethics guidelines outlined by the FCC.

Furthermore, Fox News has also been criticized for its lack of journalistic integrity and credibility, which has resulted in their expulsion from Canada. Recently, individual Fox News anchors have even gone as far as to apologize for repeatedly broadcasting Lies and Fake news intended to incite hatred amongst their viewers, particularly against the Muslim community.

Adding to these criticisms, a recent study conducted by a prestigious university concluded that Fox News was a highly unreliable news source with viewers who were woefully misinformed about world events. In fact, the study revealed that the most informative news source was National Public Radio (NPR), which presents news in a more unbiased and balanced manner.

In summary, it is evident that Fox News should be taken with a grain of salt, considering their penchant for disseminating lies and false information. Consequently, viewers who opt for Fox News for their daily news analysis may be doing themselves a great disservice by restricting their perceptions and failing to receive accurate information.

I used to really enjoy tuning into FoxNews.com in the evenings and catching up on the latest news and current affairs. One of my favorite shows used to be O'Reilly, but unfortunately, after his departure from the network, I have struggled to find someone to fill his shoes. While Bolling has done an ok job, he just doesn't have the same impact as Bill did.

However, I have found that Tucker Carlson's show is just not for me. I find his personality incredibly abrasive and his interviewing style doesn't sit well with me. It feels like he is just looking for a fight and trying to catch people out, rather than having a genuine conversation with his guests.

As for The Five, I used to think it was fantastic when Bolling was moderating, but lately, I have found it difficult to watch. While I appreciate the different perspectives of the hosts, I find Juan and Beckel particularly grating. It's like they are just trying to outdo each other in terms of who can be the most annoying, and it's a real turn-off for me.

That being said, I do still enjoy watching Hannity, as I appreciate his conservative perspective on things. However, I do feel like he can be a bit repetitive at times, and I wish he would mix things up a bit more.

It's a shame that some of the previous shows that I loved so much, like Greta, Bill and Megan, are no longer on FoxNews.com. I think the network is definitely losing some of its appeal for me, and I'm sure I'm not the only one who feels this way. It's a shame that the network seems to be going the way of ESPN, but I guess that's just the way it is these days. All that said, I know that conservatives are not going anywhere and that we will continue to make our voices heard, no matter what the media tries to do.

It appears that this reviewer is not a fan of Fox News. They seem to believe that the network is dishonest and manipulative in their reporting, using "fake polls" to push their own agenda. The reviewer is also critical of the network's ownership, suggesting that they are part of a larger group that controls all mainstream media. They take issue with the network's coverage of the 2020 election, particularly their portrayal of Joe Biden as the likely winner. The reviewer suggests that many democrats may actually vote for Trump out of frustration with the current state of affairs. They go on to call the owners of Fox News "[censored]bags" and compare them to Hitler, saying that they are just as much an enemy of the people. This reviewer clearly has strong feelings on the subject and does not hold back in expressing their disdain for Fox News.