Pure Energy Products reviews and complaints

Bogus agreement to cancel after ordering than they take $149.95 from your account immediately then tell you that they can only refund $100.00. Beware people!

My credit card was charged 149.95 approximately 3 weeks after I had agreed to pay 4.95 s&h on a 'free' 2 week sample of Phenerthin, a diet pill.When I had my bank challenge the charge, and cancel my card, I received a letter stating www.usaveonpills.com obtained an authorization code. I never authorized anything more than 4.95!

Beware!

On the 21st of August 2007 I ordered a free sample of diet pills and just had to pay shipping of $4.95. I gave them my router number and on the 24th of August the took the money from my account as of today I still have not recieved the product not the refund I asked for.

company billed my crdit card $149.95 for a product which was returned. They originally said it could be returned for a FULL refund. They will not credit my account. Now they have turned me into a collection agency for more money. I DO NOT HAVE ANY OF THEIR PRODUCT!

i had only order a free sample for $4.95 then found out they charged my account $149.95 which i did not approve of purchasing after. so i try calling and leaving message so i could talk to someone about this situation no respone. i hope my bank could help me fix this problem with this company.

Happening to me right now charge came under the name Homerun Media. Started at Prestige Marketing Services who I gave original acct numbers to on 12/9/07 for the $4.95 charge which I will not deny or refuse to pay. They deny any affiliation with Homerun Media but phone number given to my financial institution is for Pure Energy Products [protected] this might help. Have not recieved the product and wonder what the outcome will be my bank is investigating this carefully and I will not lose any funds. Posted against my account on 12/31/07. Dispute filed 1/2/08 would have been at the bank if open New Years Day.

I am going through the same thing right now! I ordered the free sample for $4.95 then found out they charged my account $149.95 and are sending me another shipment which I did not order. I just disputed the charges with my bank so I hope it works out. I cannot get a hold of these people to discuss this problem.

I recently checked my bank statement and noticed that I had a $149.95 charge from an unknown company out of Oklahoma. After calling the phone number that was attached to the charge I found out that it was Pure Energy Products... A company that I have never heard of. Now I am stuck trying to get a hold of them & trying to figure out how they got my credit card number. Next step is to call my bank to see if I can get it taken off.

Receiving shipments of product which I did not order. Have returned product and asked that purchase be credited to my card. If it is not, I will be forced to cancel the credit card. Hoping for a positive outcome but judging by previous comments from others this may be may not prove to be the case.

The company's sales rep sold me a $30, 000.00 energy system that was going to eliminate my electric bill and be completely paid off in approximately 30 months. This included state rebates and federal tax credits. The terms of financing were to be zero down, no payments and no interest for a year. This would allow for the rebates to come in before the interest and payments kicked in. After the install the city inspection was failed three times. In the meantime I received the first installment payment for $600. I called Purenergy and they told me that the terms of financing changed, nice of them to let me know. I then see the state has run out of money and would not be honoring the rebate program. I understand Pur Energy can't control this part yet it was a tough $12000 to lose. My first two electric bills came in with no savings. The third came in with a savings of 1/3 of what I was told I would get. I was then told that I was wrong and the sales rep never said I would zero out my electric bill. As I explained I would never have spent that much on a system that had a 15+ year return on investment. They made false statements to sell the system then lied about it and continue to lie about it. Stay away from this company(PURENERGY), they are frauds and are out to rip you off.

Money has been withdrawn from my personal bank account in the amount of $149.95 from this company that I have never heard of much less ordered or received anything from before. Online website shows that they sell water purifiers and related items. There's a phone # listed with the withdrawer's information that my bank gave me and when I called and asked the sales people what they sell they said "health supplements and sexual stimulants". Either way I've never ordered anything!

I, too, signed up for a trial bottle of this product. Of course, it didn't work and I canceled. Now, 6 months later, the account has been turned over to a collection agency. When I told them I didn't owe this money (it is now $282 even though the original amount claimed was $149), they sent some photocopied piece of paper from Pure Energy Products indicating that I had agreed to this shipment and could not cancel. Well, that was never on the website that I visited when I ordered the trial bottle. What a scam. We ought to get together and file a class action not only against them but against the collection agency that is trying to collect this debt. This is so bogus.

I too was taken in by this FREE 15 day trial for only 4.95. Two weeks later my credit card was debited for $149.95. I call and got the same results as everyone else,until I call and acted like I wanted to place an order. It wasn't until then that I could talk to a human being. He was very sarcastic and said I had agreed to the contract when I clicked on a certain link. I had only agreed to the 4.95 deduction. I told him I was stopping payment, and not to debit anymore. He told me I was violating the contract and I would face penilities, and would be turned into the credit bureau. I will close my account before I let them take and other dime. Also there were no directions or return address in the packaging.

Beware!

You can look up this company at purenergyonline.com. Don't let them sucker you

NACHSHON DRAIMAN 09-17582 and Multiut 09-17575 file for bankruptcy
ilnbke
09-17582

ilnbke
09-17575

On May 14, 2009, NACHSHON DRAIMAN filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The filer is being represented by Michael L Ralph, Sr of the firm Ralph, Schwab & Schiever, Chtd.
A bankruptcy petition preparer’s failure to comply with the provisions of
title 11 and the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure may result in
fines or imprisonment or both 11 U.S.C. §110; 18 U.S.C. §156.
Multiut Corporation
/s/ SCOTT R. CLAR
SCOTT R. CLAR [protected]
Crane, Heyman, Simon, Welch & Clar
Suite 3705
135 South LaSalle Street
Chicago, IL [protected]
[protected] Fax: [protected]
May 14, 2009
Nachshon Draiman
/s/ Nachshon Draiman
President
May 14, 2009

I certify under penalty of perjury that the information provided above is true and correct.
Signature of Debtor: /s/ Nachshon Draiman
Nachshon Draiman
Date: May 14, 2009
Software

B4 (Official Form 4) (12/07)
United States Bankruptcy Court
Northern District of Illinois
In re Nachshon Draiman Case No.
Debtor(s) Chapter 11
LIST OF CREDITORS HOLDING 20 LARGEST UNSECURED CLAIMS
Following is the list of the debtor's creditors holding the 20 largest unsecured claims. The list is prepared in
accordance with Fed. R. Bankr. P. 1007(d) for filing in this chapter 11 [or chapter 9] case. The list does not include (1)
persons who come within the definition of "insider" set forth in 11 U.S.C. § 101, or (2) secured creditors unless the value of
the collateral is such that the unsecured deficiency places the creditor among the holders of the 20 largest unsecured claims.
If a minor child is one of the creditors holding the 20 largest unsecured claims, state the child's initials and the name and
address of the child's parent or guardian, such as "A.B., a minor child, by John Doe, guardian." Do not disclose the child's
name. See 11 U.S.C. § 112; Fed. R. Bankr. P. 1007(m).
(1)
Name of creditor and complete
mailing address including zip
code
(2)
Name, telephone number and complete
mailing address, including zip code, of
employee, agent, or department of creditor
familiar with claim who may be contacted
(3)
Nature of claim (trade
debt, bank loan,
government contract,
etc.)
(4)
Indicate if claim is
contingent,
unliquidated,
disputed, or subject
to setoff
(5)
Amount of claim [if
secured, also state
value of security]
Alan Mandel
7520 N. Skokie Blvd.
Skokie, IL 60077
Alan Mandel
7520 N. Skokie Blvd.
Skokie, IL 60077
Attorney's Fees and
Costs
Disputed
Subject to Setoff
193, 963.62
BankFinancial, F.S.B.
3443 W. Touhy Avenue
Lincolnwood, IL 60712
Bank Financial
3443 W. Touhy Avenue
Lincolnwood, IL 60712
Personal Line of
Credit
120, 000.00
BankFinancial, F.S.B.
3443 W. Touhy Avenue
Lincolnwood, IL 60712
Bank Financial
3443 W. Touhy Avenue
Lincolnwood, IL 60712
Guaranty on Bank
Loan, Lifescan
Laboratiries, Inc.
Contingent
Unliquidated
259, 748.58
BankFinancial, F.S.B.
3443 W. Touhy Avenue
Lincolnwood, IL 60712
Bank Financial
3443 W. Touhy Avenue
Lincolnwood, IL 60712
Guaranty on Bank
Loan, Peterson Park
Health Care Center
Contingent
Unliquidated
1, 048, 361.25
BankFinancial, F.S.B.
3443 W. Touhy Avenue
Lincolnwood, IL 60712
Bank Financial
3443 W. Touhy Avenue
Lincolnwood, IL 60712
Guaranty of Real
Estate Mortgage
Loan, Lifescan
Laboratiries, Inc.
Contingent
Unliquidated
859, 670.31
Brickyard Bank
6676 N. Lincoln Avenue
Lincolnwood, IL [protected]
Brickyard Bank
6676 N. Lincoln Avenue
Lincolnwood, IL [protected]
Guaranty on Bank
Loan, Embassy
Holdings, LLC
Contingent
Unliquidated
2, 200, 000.00
Brickyard Bank
6676 N. Lincoln Avenue
Lincolnwood, IL [protected]
Regina Hirn
Brickyard Bank
6676 N. Lincoln Avenue
Lincolnwood, IL [protected]
[protected]
Personal line of
credit
677, 251.85
Cole Taylor Bank
225 W. Washington St.
8th Floor
Chicago, IL 60606
Jonathon Rothstein
Cole Taylor Bank
225 W. Washington St., 8th Floor
Chicago, IL 60606
[protected]
Guaranty of Bank
Loan LOC, LCF
Associates
Contingent
Unliquidated
400, 000.00
Cole Taylor Bank
225 W. Washington St.
8th Floor
Chicago, IL 60606
Cole Taylor Bank
225 W. Washington St., 8th Floor
Chicago, IL 60606
Guaranty of Real
Estate Mortgage
Loan, LCF
Associates
Contingent
Unliquidated
1, 000, 000.00
Danny Shabat
3531 W. Howard
Skokie, IL 60076
Danny Shabat
3531 W. Howard
Skokie, IL 60076
200, 000.00
Software Copyright (c) [protected] Best Case Solutions - Evanston, IL - [protected] Best

B4 (Official Form 4) (12/07) - Cont.
In re Nachshon Draiman Case No.
Debtor(s)
LIST OF CREDITORS HOLDING 20 LARGEST UNSECURED CLAIMS
(Continuation Sheet)
(1)
Name of creditor and complete
mailing address including zip
code
(2)
Name, telephone number and complete
mailing address, including zip code, of
employee, agent, or department of creditor
familiar with claim who may be contacted
(3)
Nature of claim (trade
debt, bank loan,
government contract,
etc.)
(4)
Indicate if claim is
contingent,
unliquidated,
disputed, or subject
to setoff
(5)
Amount of claim [if
secured, also state
value of security]
Dynegy Marketing and Trade
1000 Louisiana
Suite 5800
Houston, TX 77002
Dynegy Marketing and Trade
1000 Louisiana, Suite 5800
Houston, TX 77002
Judgment Creditor -
Appeal Pending
Disputed 15, 348, 244.72
First Bank
900 East Higgins Road
Elk Grove Village, IL 60007
First Bank
900 East Higgins Road
Elk Grove Village, IL 60007
Guaranty of Bank
Loan for now
inactive business,
Embassy Day Care
Center, Inc.
Contingent
Unliquidated
Disputed
800, 000.00
Great-West Life & Annuity et al.
c/o Chittenden Murday Novotny
303 W. Madison #1400
Chicago, IL 60606
Great-West Life & Annuity et al.
c/o Chittenden Murday Novotny
303 W. Madison #1400
Chicago, IL 60606
Pending litigation -
health insurance
claims
Contingent
Unliquidated
Disputed
142, 360.00
Greenberg Traurig
77 West Wacker Drive
Suite 2500
Chicago, IL 60601
Greenberg Traurig
77 West Wacker Drive, Suite 2500
Chicago, IL 60601
Attorneys' Fees and
Costs
Disputed
Subject to Setoff
827, 310.10
Israel Discount Bank
Yehuda Halevy 27-31
POB 456
Tel Aviv, Israel, 65136
Israel Discount Bank
Yehuda Halevy 27-31, P.O. Box 456
Tel Aviv, Israel 65136
Pending Litigation Contingent
Unliquidated
Disputed
Subject to Setoff
25, 000, 000.00
Peterson Park
7520 Skokie Blvd.
Skokie, IL 60077
Peterson Park
7520 Skokie Blvd.
Skokie, IL 60077
Contingent
Unliquidated
Disputed
3, 000, 000.00
Premier Bank
1210 Central Avenue
Wilmette, IL 60091

Nachshon Draiman and Multiut charged with a $15 million judgment for fraud - $21 million with interest
Dynegy vs Multiut, Nachshon Draiman Case No.: 1:02−cv−07446
Honorable John A. Nordberg: Enter Memorandum Opinion and Order.
For the reasons set forth above, defendants motion for summary judgment is granted, and judgment is granted to plaintiff Dynegy, and against defendants Multiut and Nachshon Draiman, Future Associates
Case 1:02-cv-07446 Document 228 Filed 06/11/2008 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 3.2.1
Eastern Division
Dynegy Marketing and Trade
Plaintiff,
v. Case No.: 1:02−cv−07446
Hon. John A. Nordberg
Multiut Corporation, Nachshon Draiman, Future Associates, et al.
Defendant.
NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY
This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Wednesday, June 11, 2008:
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John A. Nordberg: Enter Memorandum
Opinion and Order. For the reasons set forth above, defendants motion for summary judgment is granted, and judgment is granted to plaintiff, and against defendants Multiut and Nachshon Draiman, Future Associates on Counts I and II of plaintiffs amended complaint, in the amount of
$15, 348, 244.72 plus interest accruing from October 1, 2004. Judgment is granted for plaintiff and against defendants Nachshon Draiman, Multiut, Future Associates on Counts I through VI of defendants
ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and criminal dockets of this District. For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.
CONCLUSION

For the reasons set forth above, defendant's Nachshon Draiman motion for summary judgment is granted, and judgment is granted to plaintiff - Dynegy, and against defendants Multiut and Nachshon Draiman, Future Associates on Counts I and II of plaintiff's amended complaint, in the amount of $15, 348, 244.72 plus interest ($21 million) accruing from October 1, 2004. Judgment is granted for plaintiff and against defendants on Counts I through VI of defendants' counterclaims.
FN1. Dynegy has also filed several fraudulent transfer counts alleging that Nachshon Draiman caused Multiut to transfer over $21 million to himself, his family, and related business entities and that most of this money came from the sale of gas delivered by Dynegy. But the present summary judgment motion does not address these counts. (with interest it is $21 million as of October 1, 2008 and increasing by $115, 000 every month)

N.D.Ill., 2008.
Dynegy Marketing and Trade v. Multiut Corp., Nachshon Draiman, Future Associates
Slip Copy, 2008 WL 2410425 (N.D.Ill.)
See: www.nachshondraiman.net

Nachshon Draiman aka Nachson Draiman aka N Draiman
Multiut Corp., Multiut LLC, Future Associates, Future Associates LLC, LCF
END OF DOCUMENT
Nachshon Draiman, Chicago – nursing home administrator license ([protected]). revoked
Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation 2008
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML
Nachshon Draiman, Chicago – nursing home administrator license ([protected]). revoked and fined $2000 for misrepresenting information in his application ... providing false college diploma
www.idfpr.com/Forms/DISCPLN/0108_dis.pdf - Similar pages

See: www.nachshondraiman.net
www.nachshondraiman.org
www.draiman.net
www.illinoisantidefamation.org

1. Minute Orders 12/23/04
No notice 1:02-cv-07446 Dynegy Mkg & Trade-v-Multiut Corp, et al Docket Date: 12 /27/04 MINUTE ORDER of 12/23/04 by Honorable Michael T. Mason : Plaintiff's ...
www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/MinOrds/1223.htm - 65k - Cached - Similar pages
2. Minute Orders 01/10/05
No notice 1:02-cv-07446 Dynegy Mkg & Trade-v-Multiut Corp, et al Docket Date: 01 /10/05 MINUTE ORDER of 1/10/05 by Honorable Michael T. Mason : As stated on ...
www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/MinOrds/0110.htm - 145k - Cached - Similar pages

Elitzur Draiman and Nachshon Draiman conspiracy to defraud the Bankruptcy Court

Form B18 (10/05)
United States Bankruptcy Court
Northern District of Illinois
Case No. 05−56009
Chapter 7
In Re
Debtor*
Elitzur Draiman
7520 Skokie Blvd
Skokie, IL 60077
Social Security No.:
xxx−xx−9781
Employer's Tax I.D. No.:
DISCHARGE OF DEBTOR
It appearing that the debtor is entitled to a discharge, IT IS ORDERED: The
debtor is granted a discharge under section 727 of title 11, United States Code, (the Bankruptcy Code).
FOR THE COURT
Dated: March 27, 2006 Kenneth S. Gardner, Clerk
United States Bankruptcy Court
Bankruptcy court documents and filing under oath – show that Elitzur Draiman only has a home in Jerusalem and no other assets.
IN a pleading filed in the courts in Jerusalem Israel in 2008 Elitzur Draiman and Nachshon Draiman filed documents against their own Blind Widowed mother – Ziona Draiman – that Elizur owns about 80% of the shares of Hed Press (Corporate records show Samuel Draiman as the owner jointly with Hamodia which by law belongs to the widow of Samuel Draiman - Ziona Draiman.
Criminal charges should be filed against Elitzur Draiman and Nachshon Draiman for defrauding the Federal Bankruptcy Court in Chicago. (presenting false testimony and forged documents is a common practice by Nachshon Draiman who has multiple contempt orders for violating Federal court orders and over $100 million dollars in lawsuits for fraud and deception) (See Nachshon Draiman Nursing Home license revocation due to fraud, deceptuion and forged documents presented to Nachshon Draiman, Chicago – nursing home administrator license ([protected]) Revoked
See: See: www.nachshondraiman.net and: www.nachshondraiman.org

Elitzur (Eli) Draiman Bankruptcy doc

U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Northern District of Illinois (Chicago)
Bankruptcy Petition #: 05-56009

Assigned to: Honorable Judge Jack B. Schmetterer
Chapter 7
Voluntary
No asset
Date Filed: 10/14/2005
Date Terminated: 03/30/2006
Date Discharged: 03/27/2006

Nachshon Draiman, Chicago – nursing home administrator license ([protected]) revoked and fined
Illinois Department of Financial and
Professional Regulation NEWS
IDFPR
Disciplinary Actions for January 2008 SPRINGFIELD
The Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation (IDFPR)
announced today that the Directors of the Division of Professional Regulation, Daniel E. Bluthardt, and Insurance, Michael T. McRaith, signed the following disciplinary orders in January. Orders for the Division of Banking were authorized by Director Jorge Solis.

NURSING HOME ADMINISTRATOR

Nachshon Draiman, Chicago – nursing home administrator license ([protected])
revoked and fined $2, 000 for misrepresenting information in his application concerning postgraduate education degree, to obtain nursing home administrator licensure from the Department.

Energy Billing Fraud Charges vs Multiut owned by Nachshon Draiman!
Multiut Admitted to holding money belonging to customers.
Chicago Metro Area Consumers are taken for a ride by Multiut – Nachshon Draiman – Energy Billing fraud.

In a Class Action proceeding initiated in November 2001 - The case after numerous delays by Multiut, is now proceeding.
Gore vs Multiut - IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS Case No. 01 CH 19688
Posted on September 21st, 2007:
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
COUNTY DEPARTMENT - CHANCERY DIVISION
FILED
JACK GORE on behalf of himself and all ) NOV 28, 2002
other persons or entitles similarly situated, |
•
vs. No. 01 CH 19688
DOROTHY 8ROWN CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT
MULTIUT CORP, an Illinois corporation, } Judge Stephen A, Schiller
Defendant ) Courtroom 2402
RESPONSE TO §2-619.1 MOTION TO DISMISS J/
Plaintiff JACK GORE (“Gore”). by his attorneys LARRY D DRURY LTD., hereby responds to the Motion to Dismiss 2nd Amended Complaint, pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/2-615 and 619, brought as a combined 2-619.1 motion by defendant MULTIUT CORP. (“Multiut”).
Introduction
Multiut is trying to time-bar this case by transforming express a written agency-service contract drafted by Multiut into a contract for sale of goods, and by disputing Gore's allegations as to concealment and discovery of the wrong – but without submitting any Rule 191 affidavit or documentation. This is a class action arising out of a written contract drafted by Multiut, attached here and to the 2nd Amended Complaint as Exhibit A and B collectively referred to herein as the "contract" or "agreement “ unless otherwise indicated by context): (1)
(A) A service contract to act as Gore's "purchasing representatives" in obtaining natural gas from “off system" suppliers. This contract, entered into on or about December 1990, was titled “Agreement," Exh. A 1, 3-6, 10. And,
{B} A series of supplemental agency contracts to act as Gore’s agent, in so doing with respect to various Properties. These were entered into contemporaneously with the service contract and thereafter, and titled "Natural Gas Purchasing and Agency Agreement.” Exh.-B. (2)
(1) Similarly Multiut refers to them collectively as “the agreement” in its brief (Mem. p. 2, fn. 1). Although the documents are on separately filed pages, they are mutually inclusive and one could not be entered into without the other; e.g. the service contract refers to and incorporates the agency contracts, wherein Multiut refers to itself as Gore's 'exclusive natural gas purchasing agent'. See Exh. A, third introductory paragraph and 16-17; Exh. B 1,
(2) Exh. 8 one of the series, is dated 1998, Exh. C is Gore’s §2-806 affidavit as to the others. Gore has stated he does not have a copy of each, they are inaccessible to him i.e. no longer in his possession, whether missplaced or otherwise, and cannot be located or returned. 2nd Amd.. Compl. {4; Exh, C, in the 1st Amd. Complaint, Count 4 for breach of oral contract was voluntarily dismissed without prejudice after Gore's deposition of May 8,- 2002, when the service contract and the 1998 agency contract were produced by Multiut and adequately established, Exhs, A-B are the same Exhs. 1-2 attached to the Gore transcript, excerpts of which are attached herein as Exh. D, Similarly the missing agency agreements are likely in Multiut’s possession and will be produced in discovery.
The contract was drafted by Multiut, it unequivocally defines Multiut's role in the transactions, and shows that this case is not governed by the UCC. What is at issue here is not the "good" that Multiut obtained for Gore, but the service Multiut provided as his purchasing agent. Gore is suing upon the service and agency contract – not the natural gas - and has alleged that Multiut breached its duties in two respects;
{1} By falsely and intentionally charging and retaining for its own use funds that were to be applied to a City of Chicago 8% gross receipts tax (“Tax”), which it had promised would be placed in escrow and forwarded to the City. Between December 1990 and January 1995 (after the City of Chicago changed the Tax), Multiut collected approximately $14,000 from Gore and at least $1 million to $1.5 million from the Class, for this Tax that was not actually imposed upon Multiut. 2nd Amd. Compl. 7-9, '3! Multiut not only failed to inform Plaintiff and
the Class that the money collected was not so applied or escrowed, but also failed to escrow, account for, and refund the funds with interest.
(2) By overcharging for the service of providing natural gas. Multiut was to charge for natural gas actually supplied to Gore and the Class on a set per therm cost basis, plus an amount equal to 1/2 of their respective per therm cost savings per month, instead, Multiut overcharged and billed Gore at least $100.000 and the class millions of dollars and refuses to provide an accounting and refund with interest. Id. 10-11.
Gore has further alleged that Multiut prevented him from discovering the wrongs by intentionally concealing them until at least December 2000, when he discovered the truth and could not reasonably have done so earlier. (Gore testified at his deposition on May 8, 2002 that he first discovered the discrepancies in his bills, the overcharges, the taxes, and failure to escrow the taxes, in December 2000. See Exh, D, pp. 25-28,) Thereafter he was unable to obtain any refund and based thereon, terminated Multiut’s services on or about June 2001, However, the wrongful acts are continuing to date, in that Multiut continues to 'refuse to provide an accounting and refund with interest to Gore and the Class, all to their detriment and damage. They seek imposition of constructive trust (id. 22), an accounting and damages in not less than the foregoing amounts plus interest (id, 9-13, 23).
Gore filed the original Class Action Complaint on Nov. 20, 2001, and in lieu of responding to a motion to dismiss, filed the 1st Amended Class Action Complaint Feb. 14, 2002, setting forth 4 counts for (1) breach of
3-: The City did not and will not collect the 8% Tax, presumably because of U.S. constitutional restrictions as to the interstate commerce clause and exceptions for interstate pipelines and out-of-state suppliers. As a result in 1994 the City changed the tax from an 8% gross receipts tax to a flat rate tax of 1.4 to 1.5 cents per therm. 2nd Amd. Comp. P 8. in Multiut’s response to First Request to Admit {attached hereto as Exh. F), it has admitted the following statements about this Tax; (8) that Multiut collected approximately $14,000 in Tax from Gore between [protected]; and (9) that Multiut spent its customers Tax payments on business expenses.. Yehuda Draiman testified to the same effect in his deposition 1-10-02 See transcript excerpts attached hereto as Exh. E, at pp, 36-37,40, 68, and Exh, 6 thereto.
Activity Date: 8/15/2007 Participant: GORE JACK
CASE SET ON STATUS CALL
Court Date: 8/29/2007
Court Time: 0930
Court Room: 2402
Judge: BRONSTEIN, PHILIP L.

August 30th, 2007 at 2:25 pm
RE: MULTIUT CORP. FORMER CUSTOMERS!
Multiut owner is Nachshon Draiman of Cook County, Illinois
PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT YOU ARE PROBABLY DUE A REFUND PLUS INTEREST FOR SALES TAX ON NATURAL GAS WHICH WAS COLLECTED FROM YOU AND WITHHELD BY MULTIUT CORP. TEL # [protected] at 7514 N. Skokie Bl. Skokie, Illinois.
MULTIUT IS HOLDING APPROXIMATELY OVER ONE MILLION DOLLARS THAT MAY BELONG TO CUSTOMERS.
MULTIUT HAS OVERBILLED CUSTOMERS ON SHARED SAVINGS FOR THE PAST 14 YEARS.
THERE IS CURRENTLY A CLASS ACTION SUIT AGAINST MULTIUT.
I STRONGLY SUGGEST THAT YOU HAVE ALL YOUR BILLS THAT WERE ISSUED BY MULTIUT CORP. AUDITED THOROUGHLY THERE MAY BE STORAGE CREDITS DUE YOU AND ERRORS IN BILLING WHICH CREDITS MAY BE DUE YOU.
Multiut has admitted in Court that they are holding the money.
Gore vs Multiut 01 CH 19688 Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois
A concerned citizen
For honesty in billing

Fraud, Insolvency and numerous contempt of court orders
Dynegy Mkg & Trade v. Multiut Corp, Nachshon Draiman et al
On August 16th, 2007: Numerous Federal contempt of court orders against Nachshon Draiman and Multiut Dynegy Mkg & Trade v. Multiut Corp, Nachshon Draiman et al 1:02-cv-07446.
Multiut Corp and Nachshon Draiman dba Future Associate of Skokie, IL. are withholding evidence of fraudulent activities in the Energy industry and inflated Medicaid billing to the government for Nursing Home patients. Also Bank fraud against their bank by presenting fraudulent and inflated receivable reports in order to get and keep a credit line, Nachshon Draiman was a large stock holder of the bank. Draiman Nachshon • SC 13G • Success Bancshares Inc • On 2/17/98
Filed On 2/17/98 • SEC File 5-53545 • Accession Number [protected]
Court: United States District Court Northern District of Illinois -
Case Title: Dynegy Mkg & Trade v. Multiut Corp, Nachshon Draiman Future Associates et al
Case Number: 1:02-cv-07446
Judge: Hon. John A. Nordberg
Filed On: 10/16/2002
SUMMARY
Case Number: 1:02-cv-07446
Referred To: Honorable Michael T. Mason
Jury Demand: Defendant
Demand: $9999000
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other (190)
Jurisdiction: Diversity
Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Case Updated: 01/20/2005
NAMES
Party Name: Multiut Corporation an Illinois Corporation,
Party Type: Defendant
Attorney(s): Paul Thaddeus Fox
[protected]
Firm Name: Greenberg Traurig, LLP.
Firm Address: 77 West Wacker Drive
Suite 2500
Chicago, IL 60601
Alan Jay Mandel
[protected]
Firm Name: Alan J Mandel Ltd
Firm Address: 7520 North Skokie Blvd
Skokie, IL 60077
03/30/2007 225
NOTICE of Motion by Ira P. Gould for presentment of motion to withdraw as attorney224 before Honorable John A. Nordberg on 4/19/2007 at 02:30 PM. (Gould, Ira) (Entered: 03/30/2007)
04/18/2007 226
MINUTE entry before Judge John A. Nordberg: Motion of Ira Gould to withdraw his appearance on behalf of Multiut Corporation 224 is granted. The motion will not be heard on 4/19/07 as noticed. Mailed (vmj, ) (Entered: 04/19/2007).
For More Information See: www.antidefamationusa.com or www.antidefamation.us