the social media people net66 review: scam 850

A thread set up for directors of TSMP. You may never have heard of ADVFN.com but it is the busiest financial website in the world. I would genuinely be interested in your comments.

http://www.advfn.com/cmn/pbb/thread.php3?id=25666207

FAO: advfn.com

are you independent & have no ties with any of our previous agreavers ADVFN as it sounds like something we would be very interested in, at last a forum that wants to post the truth.
We await your response and look forward to speaking soon, as long as you are interested in the unbiased truth, this forum doesnt check anything & badbiz was a liar & a cheat, it would be good to work with an independant forum to get our voice heard and maybe then we could refer some of our clients to voice their experience without fear of getting contacted from people spreading lies scaremongering.

Kind Regards
Tom McVey

Tom

I will be totally honest here. I am a contributor to Bad Biz. But I contribute to many forums (such as ADVFN) and am only interested in the truth. My contribution to the site is more to do with financial and legal matters. I have read all the comments here and on Bad Biz although I do not really understand the mechanics of the business so it is sometimes difficult to understand the context.

I do however find it unusual that a director (if he is guilty of wrongdoing) comes on to a site to defend his company.

Just to avoid any confusion I do not own the website itself but you will find it has a wide readership. So to answer your question I am not strictly independent (because I have contributed to Bad Biz) but you have my promise that I am honourable and will listen to all sides.

Having read all 19 pages of this site I think the problem here is that (rightly or wrongly) you are being drowned out by the comments of others.

Damp man, if you are a genuine happy client, what is the content of your advert, how to you measure the success of the advert. How many click thoughs do you actually convert. What is the ratio between impressions and clicks? What other advertising do you do? Can you show us some detailed statistics reporting from TSMP? I suspect you can't answer any of these questions.

I'm here in the UK, and Steve from Bad Biz is abroad on holiday; unlike you Tom I do not have 'several' logins or pseudo names on this site unlike yourself; Just the one, Yes another person who you have really pissed off.
Yet again muddying the waters as you usually do without answering any questions directly.
Lady1000, how can you, and I quote from Tom McVey:
"...get s speedy resolution. Might I add, we are NOT a con, you 100% will have had the full terms explained to you. I am happy to provide any call START TO FINISH so you can understand clearly..."
Lady1000 is adamant that she was not informed of the rubbish unenforceable T & C's.
The Customer Service provided by Tom McVey, telling Lady1000 that she will get a speedy response whilst they are adamant that she is in the wrong and can prove it? Good call Tom, shows your emotional and intellectual maturity - Not!
What it tells people is that if they have got an issue, Tough ###! You don't care! and I strongly suspect you never have or will.
Basing your business model on 2 infamous internet marketing companies namely Lavora and Matchmaker Marketing? I think so! But this time around the fortunes will be short lived.

What it tells people is that if they have got an issue Tough ###! You don't care! and I strongly suspect you never have.
Basing your business model on 2 infamous internet marketing companies namely Lavora and Matchmaker Marketing? I think so!

i read all post an still dont no whose lying. theres alot of nasty rumers, why no post sum moore facts?

wuz Tom F really wanking his students? Did Tom McV trick people unto rolling contracted? is Badbiz also bad biz?

pheonix i am here too learn about a conpany that mite of ripped me of not explain myself to anywhone.i hav a qestion for you- wo the ### our you to make jugement and qestion me. i want too learn about if thes people ripp anyone of as igive em my credit detales.but like i hav said i hav goot work off of my add. the social media poeple told me to put a qote facebook for 10% discount on myadd to make sure i knwo, too be honest iv had small jobs nothing massiv.one woman even rang me to fix a caravan. but its definately made me money which is alllthat materrs really.i will continu to come here i think out of intrest. thers loads of fingr pointin goin on and people prettendin to be other poeple its qite a nobel to be honste iveven shown my wife. this badbiz guy is apparently t makin a cort case so we will see. i dothink that that socialmisfits commentor is ### of the earth what a horreble ###. theres callin eachother this an that but whats been said is naughty.very. did you write that phenix.lookin back through the coments you cant keep yuor temper and have got nasty before if it is you shoud be ashamed off yourslef. i hope evryone can at leaste agree on how horrible theat comment and comenter is.

Damp Man
I agree that there have been too many unsavoury comments from both sides used in this thread, some of which have gone way beyond what most consider to be acceptable.
This is a great shame as it has detracted from the purpose of the thread which is to highlight genuine customers experiences of dealing with the Social Media People.
I am a genuine customer and can assure you that my experience with TSMP has been what I consider to be at best diabolical. I do believe there are many other genuine customers also posting and this seems to be the most common feeling although some may express their feelings and anger in a stronger way.
I hope this helps
UTH

camilla1452:
Answers: 1. No. 2. Yes. 3. Depends what you mean by 'bad biz'... If you mean 'is Badbiz bad news for The Social Media People' - then the answer is 'Yes'.

camilla1452 & The Damp Man:
You say you are uncertain and desire facts and proof.
Facts on this forum include many, published documents - originally produced by The Social Media People.
Facts on 'YouTube' included telephone messages left for customers left in 2 different names, but made by the same person, and confirming the phone call from a 'fake' solicitor; which is an illegal act. The Social Media People has never refuted nor explained ANY of these calls and messages. (I'll gladly send you a copy by email if you wish.)

What is it in the errors, lies, and illegal elements contained in the published documents and recordings of The Social Media People which does not convince you?
And many of the facts can be checked against the relevant laws and regulations, so you don't have to rely on the word of anyone on this forum, whether it's me or The Social Media People. (Companies Act, VAT Regulations, ASA, Data Protection Act, Unfair Terms, Misrepresentation Act, etc)
-

24-07-2011: Judge the facts on The Social Media People.
Camilla1452 wants to judge the situation on facts, rather than the ‘opinions’ of commentators. That shows commendable fairness and an open mind.

Here’s an idea...
In individual ‘posts’, what if I publish original documents, possibly adding a comment or two from my own perspective?
Then, camilla1452 – or anyone else – can offer their own views, and ask questions. I’ll respond.
If The Social Media People choose to comment, that may also prove informative.

So – camilla1452; Would you like to examine the facts, and have your questions addressed?

Example: Have a look at the attached (I hope!), genuine TSMP ‘Order’. Can you see why I come to the conclusion that this original TSMP document proves that it, and various documents would not reach me?
Additionally, are there any other ‘shortcomings’ to be observed?
What implications might be associated with this?
-

I paid $32.67 for a XBOX 360 and my mom got a 17 inch Toshiba laptop for $94.83 being delivered to our house tomorrow by FedEX. I will never again pay expensive retail prices at stores. I even sold a 46 inch HDTV to my boss for $650 and it only cost me $52.78 to get. Here is the website we using to get all this stuff, CentShack.com

25-07-2011: The Social Media People scammers attract 'spammers'.

Annoying though it is, the positive aspect about 'spammers' posting their little 'adverts' is that they pick threads like this one because they see The Social Media People gets lots of negative publicity. Unlike me, and other genuine customers, the 'spammers' don't care why there are lots of posts and criticism; to them its just publicity.

Do not be distracted by the 'invasions of spammers' - the real issue is the appalling business practices, lies and non-existent integrity and ethics of The Social Media People.
As demonstrated by the despicable, factual information revealed from their own documents, etc; which can't be dismissed as the 'opinions of the biased'.

uth - wher didyou go rong shold i luck owt for anythin from them?

tom faulkner you are biased thow so watever you hav to say shouldnot be read and interpereted as unbiassd. why stick up for that badbiz when he talks pony. iseen that skysbm profile and it was him andlooking athe pictures onhere he has comented on his own form to back up wat he says so why would we want to beleve you or him.
iv lookd at your print owts on here an notice you have made 124 coments. i fhink thats sad as ### and sumfin doesnt addup with you and that babiz guy. isee people unsur and complainin but you 2ar abit personil. our we missing sumthing. you both our very personal an why is badbiz badnews for anyone i read his websit and allhe ever dune is complained about debt colcetors coming to his hous and his sky porn tv subscribtion. i also see itsbeen mentoned he own www.shefux.com ithink the only person steve isdangrous to is himself getin inloadof debt wiv his ### in his hans. i alsosee socialmedia people hav quoted af of a group on facebook - isther any truwth in that

25-07-2011: Damp Man -
I think it's fair to say we are ALL biased. I accept that I am, but in this case the bias was created by the dreadful experience I've suffered at the hands of The Social Media People. I started my dealings with TSMP with good will and realistic expectations; but events began to change my opinion. Your own experience may differ - but that does not invalidate mine.
Both you and camilla1452 have expressed a desire to be fair and I understand that.
But tell me - if a genuine document produced by The Social Media People clearly shows errors, or breaches of regulations, or other shortcomings etc, and these can be seen just by looking at them, or checked against the relevant UK laws etc, - how does my bias come into it? Anyone can check for themselves if they choose to apply OBJECTIVITY. And that also enables anyone to put their own - and my - bias aside.

Keep in mind that in my very first post on this forum, I suggested that The Social Media People publish ALL documents and ALL recordings of its dealings with me; and let others judge the evidence. How was that me being biased? TSMP had the opportunity to prove its claims with the example of a real life disatisfied customer - but instead it chose not to.
The offer still stands, why don't you ask them to publish it all so that the (your view) 'biased' Tom Faulkner is shown up?
I've published some of the documents already, and even though I do comment on them it does not prevent anyone from forming their own judgement - based on FACTS - not rants, or claims or bias.

So - a single, simple point to consider objectively, using the previous document - the 'Order', published yesterday. If that crucial 'Order' (the document upon which the whole deal hinges) has my email address recorded wrongly (which everyone can see - there should be only one 'l' in 'tiscali') how will that document reach me when it is emailed?
Over to you...
That isn't the only 'error' in that document, but let's stick to that at the moment

26-07-2011:
The document which was attached to the previous 'post has disappeared. Don't know why, but I'll try again.
Relates to point made at end of previous post [protected]) - Wrong email address.

26-07-2011: Has The Social Media People etc committed criminal offences?

Companies and organisations processing personal information are required by law to be registered as ‘Data Controllers’. (Data Protection Act 1998, Part 111)

1. Have a look at this page on the website of the government’s ‘Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO):
http://www.ico.gov.uk/ESDWebPages/Search.asp?EC=3&Name=The%20Social%20Network%20Marketing%20Company&Address=&Postcode=&SubDiv=&Activities=&Registration=
2. Key in the name of: The Social Network Marketing Company Ltd, or Net66 Web Services Ltd, or The Social Media People Ltd.
Unless things have changed in the last 12 hours, you’ll find that none of these companies is registered.

3. Companies not registered commit a criminal offence. (Data Protection Act 1998, Part 111, Section 21)

This is not my bias or opinion. It is objective independent, evidence anyone can check for themselves.
Quotes from ICO website:
“ The Data Protection Act 1998 requires every data controller who is processing personal information in an automated form to notify, unless they are exempt. Failure to notify is a criminal offence. Register entries have to be renewed annually. If you are required to notify but don’t renew your registration, you are committing a criminal offence.”

“Notification is a statutory requirement and every organisation that processes personal information must notify the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), unless they are exempt. Failure to notify is a criminal offence.”

Now - this is my opinion: I doubt that most visitors to this forum will be surprised by yet another breach of law or regulations by TSMP. Hardly a good recommendation for anyone considering placing their trust and business with a company.

Hi everyone I am back from my holidays, had a great time so I guess its time to get BadBiz forum back online on its new dedicated server, sorry for the inconvenience.

Moving on from this can you believe that Tom McVey made a privacy complaint to Youtube about the video I had posted. Not to worry Tom I have replaced it with a better one.

And I will be posting the other video on another website anyway. Hope you’re all doing well and now I can get on with issuing my lawsuit against The Social Media People, Net 66, Tom McVey, Neil McVey, Steven I’ve gone into hiding Jackson (The Directors) and their Lawyer Jonathan Barker Smith. Lets see if they all turn up to court with a good defence and I hope Jonathan Barker Smith has an SRA licence.

Ironic that Tom McVey complains about privacy and yet he is willing to post peoples names with nasty comments and also fails on DSAR’s

Naughty Naughty could be an £1/2 million fine for failing, I think I will send one myself.

Nice to see you back on the Island Steve.
You have missed quite a lot of TSMP and their new logins!
I should feel very complimented as I have been accused of being you! Little does Tom McVey know!
It is such a shame that 'individuals' do not read all the comments on this site and filter out the real ### and look at the facts which are clearly stated. Tom Faulkner, empathy all the way. You are precise, clear, coherent, logical and eloquent in stating your case.
Sadly 'The Damp Man' does not carry that ability however, I find it rather strange that his 'angle' is somewhat TSMP orientated(?) Could this be another TSMP log in? I would hazard an educated guess!
Are people biased on this site against TSMP, Web 66 and the handful of companies run by Thomas McVey and his daddy? The majority are, as they are extremely annoyed, peed off, felt that they have been truly scammed and ripped off, and generally feel aggrieved at the way the McVey companies perform their business.
Anybody who (except they McVey clan) does not have a grievance would surely be more than happy to give their company name and contact details to confirm what an 'excellent' service they have received (it is called testimonials, oh I forgot all the testimonials that TSMP had on their site were removed due to the ASA's intervention!).
Tom McVey may think that he is a 'big' player and the big fish in the pond/cesspit that he wallows in, but he is a shrimp in the ocean of marketing here in the UK and his type of company are ten a penny, here one day and gone the next; in his instance with the help of a little push to the legal department's of various Governmental institutions as well as the Queens bench!
The outcome will without a shadow of a doubt give some closure to the hundreds, if not thousands of companies that he has conned; and incidentally the claim that TSMP has over 12, 500 happy clients is a figure conjured up by the hashish cloud which I am convinced is the result of trying to come down from the ecstasy of the cocaine rushes which cause such outlandish statements made by Tom McVey.

Hi Informer28 stand proud if they think your me it must mean that people that have been ripped off are eventually learning something and are getting stronger by the day, I am proud of you.

In relation to new commenter’s yes I can see a couple of them. In one Tom McVey as turned into a girl with camilla1452 no wonder he likes kissing guys and the other The Damp Man I wonder where he is damp? You have to think one simple thing if you had a good service from a company why would look for complaints about the company and post there? Ask any company statistics would show that happy customers would not waste there time, none for sure even after receiving a 10% discount would stick around to be in the cross fire. As the saying goes Tom McVey must be desperate as he keeps saying other people are me and then posts himself as customers.

Moving on in relation to reviews they posted famous people saying they’re good which when checked out with the people concerned they all stated they were a complete fabrication. Amazingly a company with allegedly 12, 500 customers he cannot come up with any verifiable customers.

Now there are reviews still there although there is not a direct link, try typing blog-reviews/social-media-people-reviews/ after there domain name and you will see them with some more false reviews. Ironically Tom Mcvey criticized my websites saying he made me look like an idiot. The only problem is that they are now using the same engine as me “Wordpress” So I wonder why they copy idea’s from idiots, as the saying goes those who copy idiots are indeed “idiots”. Although it does make me laugh how my Google page rank is twice as good as a business that claims to be at the cutting edge of latest technology. Quite simply I must be twice as good at then they are and the statement can be checked independently

He has even copied the Poll idea to track IP addresses no doubt. Amazing for a company of these skills, I have seen some bad website designers and SEO companies in my time but even some of the poor like BT Customer Street even these provide links to there recommended bad work.

Move onto there Dot Com domain name as this has changed with a Wordpress website designed by someone else. Ironically the website designs of Net 66 are not being used. What does that tell you guys?

camilla1452 and The Damp Man if you’re to be believed you should post your website name and link so people can see how effective the so called advertising as done for you.

If as Damp Man explains The Social Media People gave him a discount for posting on here all of a sudden he has got really involved. I read a comment of Damp man stating how horrible some people are with such nasty comments and I must agree, but has Damp man read all the comments where Tom McVey, Steven Jackson and friends posted exactly the same type of comment? Based on this statement he must agree that Tom McVey, Steven Jackson and other directors are just as bad as the other poster.

I have for the record just wrote a DSAR (Data Subject Access Request) which must comply with s7 of the Data Protection Act. To both Net 66 and The Social Media People and when they fail in 40 days there will be another complaint issued to the ICO.

Now I am back I can continue with the lawsuit against all the defendants as pre action notice time is well and truly over with. See you in court Tom McVey, Steven Jackson, Neil McVey, Jonathan Barker Smith Net 66 and The Social Media People. Just to let you know Tom when Steven Jackson does not turn up in court and does not answer the case you lose, it’s no good trying to get rid of his posts now I already have them all. By the way it won’t be the Bailiffs knocking your door it will be the Official Receivers Office closing you down both in business and personally when I make you bankrupt. I hope you get some good lawyers as I don’t think your previous lawyer Jonathan Barker Smith will be up for it as he will need an SRA licence to represent you.

27-07-2011: The Social Media People fails to deliver on DSARs.

The DSARs I sent to The Social Network Marketing Company Ltd, Net66 Web Services Ltd. and The Social Media People Ltd. are all now a month overdue.
The companies have been reminded several times - because I like to be fair - but are still trying to stall with pathetic manouvres like:
a. Ignoring me.
b. Demanding payments which they already received along with the original requests back on 20 May.
First they tried demanding VAT - which they are not allowed to charge. Then they say (paraphrase) 'You sent us the cheque but you haven't paid'? This along with the pathetic misconception that because they chose to return a cheque to me they didn't need to get on with the DSAR. I know they are wrong, and ICO confirms they are wrong; but its no good me telling TSMP - 'cos they won't believe me.

And then it turns out they haven't even registered with ICO (as required by law) as Data Controllers - which is a criminal offence.
Its worth noting that everyone who provides their personal and banking details to any of these companies is trusting their information to people who blatantly flout the very laws designed to protect your data from misuse or poor security.
No good business practice. No Integrity. No ethics. No idea. No Data Controller Registration

camilla4785 you now reveal your true self "Tom McVey" the cross dressing boy as we have contiually said you need to look into the Mirror as what you're sating is what you are, It looks well when a Managing Director stoops to the level you do it only goes to show what you are.

Again the truth about you will be revealed in the court room where you will squirm like a little kid and ruin yourself. In relation to the comment of Viagra or Cialis that is for you to play with your boyfriend with. The only thing Tom is big and hard with is his head. he loves to insult people like a true proffesional, You should send all your 12, 500 wanna be customers on here to show just exactly what your like. and by the way Tom I don't sell porn I sell websites which ironically blow your crap into the ground.

As for your height complex your slightly out which you will see when I cross examine you in court, I wonder if you will be showing your tough man image in the court room, Go on Tom wear your kinky black leather gloves just to show how tough you really are.

And likewise camilla4785 you disgust me as your nothing more than a scam who doesn't understand he looks like a complete muppet on here and everywhere else he posts.

27-07-2011:
On the 24th I directed a polite post towards camilla1452 which began as follows:
"Judge the facts on The Social Media People.
Camilla1452 wants to judge the situation on facts, rather than the ‘opinions’ of commentators. That shows commendable fairness and an open mind. Here’s an idea... In individual ‘posts’, what if..."

I think we can now see that whoever camilla1452 is, she is NOT looking for a fair assessment of facts, as the facts presented have been totally ignored in favour of a brief and irrelevant rant.
Now we can once again concentrate on the matters in hand -
the unlawful, unethical, dishonourable, double-dealings of The Social Media People.

By the way Tom F why was they charging you a montly ongoing fee, It says on the email quite plainly Term 1. this means you only agreed to one payment. THIS IS FACT!

Sorry BadBiz - you are falling into the trap of trying to apply logic ethics, honesty and good business practices to the agreements and arguements presented by TSMP.
The Social Media People have NONE of those precious commodities so don't need to work to any rules of normal, civilised, business agreements etc.

Tom I kind of understood that a month or so ago when Mr Steven Jackson the afformentioned Director who has gone into hiding whilst he takes up Tom's rear end, Sorry Backseat on things. Mr Jackson must of been quite stressed out for him to now take that back seat on such a sucessful company. Hold on those are Tom McVey's claims. My lawyers have been given the green light to take the whole bunch of them on and paperwork is currenlty on its way to the lawyers proving that Tom McVey Libelled my name very seriously.

I did note that reading some of the pages back that Tom was trying to insinuate that something had happened to me. Tom I was on holiday at our Villa probably something you could never afford as you actually have to make clear honest profits to buy something which you obviously cannot afford. Its good that you think I have been elswhere though perhaps you can use your knowledge of my whereabouts as evidence in the court room.

I still reccomend you get yourself a lawyer though Tom and show him what you have been posting about people.

Come and play major league with me and see what will happen to you.

The Social Media People have been invited to post on here but nothing yet.

http://www.advfn.com/cmn/fbb/thread.php3?id=25666207

27-07-2011: The importance of the 'Order' - probably the reason The Social Media People rarely supply it!

Earlier today a comment was made about the document I published a day or so ago - the'Order'.
It read, "By the way Tom F why were they charging you a montly ongoing fee? It says on the email quite plainly Term 1. This means you only agreed to one payment. THIS IS FACT!"

I hadn't previously noticed that important point, but that is probably (one of the reasons) why The Social Media People take great care NOT TO PROVIDE customers with this (legally required) document.
I can't speak for every TSMP customer, but from those many I've been in contact with I am the only person to have ever seen their precious 'Order'.
And I only got it 2 weeks AFTER the cancellation because (a) I insisted, and (b) TSMP thought it would prove me wrong, so they could then con me into paying more money.

If ANYONE else has a similar 'Order' please let me know so we can compare notes.

Oh Tom McVey, you bitter and twisted little person. Why all the alias's? Camilla(in various forms), Damp Man, Market U ser to name but a few!
One minute you contribute to this site as a Director of a 'legitimate' company who signs off as as a non existent Director then ignores the question as to why; then gives a sermon about your supposed success and your companies; then you get all agitated and lose the plot (your plot incidentally), start being all nasty, personal and full of a toxic anger; try and show concern with your emotional intelligence (you might want to look up what emotional intelligence is!) and expect all individuals who have had personal dealings with you to bow to your 'superiority' with your proven mickey mouse company documentation, your threats by innuendo, verbal and written.
The only person who has stoked the fire of discontent and placed in the public domain the contempt that people have for you and your immediate family, Is YOU Thomas. You have 'touched' people and they have rebelled.
I would say "lets have some honesty". Sadly this is a word like integrity, morale, professionalism and businesslike which are alien to you.
This ultimately will be your downfall; Oh dear, what a shame, how sad -NOT!
Daughter nearly one and daddy being taken to court for contravening numerous legal requirements of a company; civil actions etc. Do you need daddy no thumbs to change your ###? No you don't. what you need is a good legal team to try and drag you out of the quagmire that you are currently in (I suggest you do not use that 'legal' bunch that you are on first name terms with that are at your beck and call) .

camilla4785 Well everyone knows your Tom McVey now, You state I work for a company called Yes Loans I can satisfy myself with your stupidity and how easy it was to trap you and reveal exactly who you ### sorry are. Obviously you claim them to be scammers I think it’s worth sending a few people the link to this page so they can sue your sorry broke ### as well.

You’re nothing more than a dumb ### that is getting his fingers burnt as he does not have a clue as to who he is dealing with dumb ### you need to get your facts straight about people.

Amazingly today I have been checking out your daddy’s Net 66 banking with Lloyds TSB and what a sorry state of affairs that account is in and this is the account you take all the payments for The Social Media People. It is also pretty obvious that Tom McVey who has worse grammar than a 7 year old obviously can’t even read. I also heard that you had to have bailiffs at your door for a measly £400 or so, Bailiffs Tom did they scare daddy?

I was reliably informed he paid them after scouting around trying to come up with the money. I bet they had to scam a few more customers for you first so that you could pay the bill to get the bailiff off your back.

Tom McVey claims to have an office in London. Does he own that building? No Does he own the run down buildings in Manchester? No What I was trying to get over to your thick stupid brain is that you can’t afford and holiday but your just to stupid to read. How dumb are you? Everyone you can see Toms executive office entrance for The Social Media People and Net 66 in the ### prostitute area of Manchester. In this video on Youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XELCepYa0BM

Can you even believe that Tom McVey made a complaint to Youtube about my previous video breaching his privacy then he posts nasty comments about everyone else breaching there privacy. Are you going to cry like a little baby again Tom about this video? Lets give a arrh, Again Tom McVey posts peoples names at will he forgot about the responsibilities of companies under the Data Protection Act 1998. Interesting fines you will be accumulating there Tom.

Tom it is even known that you call yourself a few bad names, just to try and get sympathy on page 19 under the guise The Social Misfits are ### he posts some bad words about himself probably in an attempt to deflect the libel case against him, he then says in a post under his own guise “and then I think all the business people reading this forum can see we are the victim of vicious competitors & what appears to be somebody with exactly the same writing patterns making insult after insult. I actually pity people who are that bitter & twisted in life”. You were bang on about writing patterns Tom McVey they are your writing patterns written totally by you and anyone with any sense can see it also.

He then claims “We provide fantastic services with now, 13500+ clients & will continue to do so”. That’s why I keep getting emails from people stating they have been scammed by your company Tom. I will repeat that emails stating your company have scammed them. But I suppose they’re all liars as well Tom and your Mr Innocent victim taking all their money.

He also posts “and there are some rumours going around about what is happening to him. Perhaps all the lies posted on here by him may have caught up with him”. The only rumours about anything different from being on holiday come from you Tom. There are a number of people on here that know exactly where I have been and they are laughing at you for being your usual stupid self.

Under camilla4785 you then post again if you cant read “wht were collectors at your door?” Dumb ### there as never been any collectors at my door. And again you can’t read again “why did your "wife" not have money to pay for parking?” Because her debit card failed for security dumb ###. I don’t suppose that has ever happened to you as you have never been out of Manchester. Certainly you must have never been out of the UK. Next we move onto Tom McVey acting as Camilla's Chinchilla wow the guy pretending to be woman as now turned in a Monkey what was that name again Camilla's Chimp?

Camilla's Chinchilla do you have a problem with gays it certainly looks that way because of the way you write, Anyway as Tom McVey will tell himself he is already admitted to being gay. It’s hilarious the way you write about yourself so much Tom.

One thing is true you say though “He has bad mouthed some of the best solicitors & biggest companies in this country” Why do you think those best solicitors don’t do anything about it? The answer is simple they get sued and I win, In amongst those best Solicitors are ACS Law done for scamming thousands of people. Davenport Lyons busted for breaching 6 rules of the SRA code of conduct.

If that is no help to you Tom McVey everyone knows on the fence exactly where you sit on the side of scams, thieving ###, You can post as much as you like about what you think about me, the time you will regret it will be in the court room. Keep it going Tom McVey it will be the destruction of your scams forever. Tom I then notice you comment about a Porn website and after a little bit of research on there it’s amazing to find you’re a registered user of the website. The other thing Camilla's Chinchilla People with Coprolalia don’t call people mother ###ers in text they rarely even speak it. So again you show what an absolute idiot you are. Another of you really stupid comments “He is now starting to mess with big boys though. Top UK solicitors & hosting companies can crush this little ### like the fly on the wall he wishes he was” Why haven’t they then?

http://shefux.co.uk/clip/search_result.php?query=Tom+McVey&type=users&cbsearch=Search

Need I say any more about you joining that website on 13/06/2011 and viewed your profile on there 161 times and that you have 41 videos

Well guys and girls if this is a company you want to be in contact with you can see what sort of abuse they will throw at you.

TOM MCVEY & THE SOCIAL MEDIA PEOPLE WILL BE GOING OUT OF BUSINESS FOREVER WHEN THEY THREATEN YOU SIMPLY TELL THEM TO GET LOST AS THEY DON’T HAVE A LEGAL LEG TO STAND ON.

28-07-2011: Facts. Some facts which all readers can check about The Social Media People.

Wow. Lots of unpleasant exchanges and name calling recently. There may be some facts in there but most of us can’t really know how much is bravado and lies.

So I want to use some more facts to further confirm that The Social Media People lies.
And on this occasion, as with some others, the lies are not to me but the legal authorities.

Tom McVey is a director of the following companies:
1. The Social Media People Ltd. (previously named 'Facebook-Ads Ltd.')
2. Net66 Web Services Ltd.
3. The Social Network Marketing Company Ltd.

Referring to the attached, un-edited pages, from documents of Incorporation and Changes of Director Details, we can see that even on official documents, submitted to a government department, and on which the very existence of the Ltd. companies rests, Tom McVey lies. He records two different Dates of Birth.
(The full documents are openly available to anyone at: http://www.companieshouse.gov.uk/ )

And it’s not JUST his DoB he lies about. The addresses recorded also show another lie – in the postcode.

A bad advert for the company’s everyday business activities, and the integrity, ethics and honesty of Tom McVey.
Who would trust their business to a company whose Managing Director blatantly lies on official government documents?

28-07-2011:
Does anyone remember the camilla1452 of a few days ago whose 1st post read:
" i read all post an still dont no whose lying. theres alot of nasty rumers, why no post sum moore facts?"

For someone who seemed to want to deal in facts rather than unsubstantiated claims which may or may not be lies, she has had an amazing change of character in the last day or so. - A different identity (?) - or just 'retired' to let another 'camilla' take on the fight? Or perhaps they are indeed Tom McVey? There's no way I can prove it but it looks likely.

The new Camilla IGNORES facts. She posts unsubtantiated assertions (which may or may not be true; we can't check). Camilla4785 is convincingly in the ranks of the people whom her namesake claimed were confusing the issues. Just like Tom McVey.

The issues are the proven (with real, unbiased, verifiable, hard, evidence) misdemeanors, lies, dishonesty,
and crimes of The Social Media People.

I must say, I have NEVER used another log in name on here & never will. We have nothing to hide & are very confident these lies are slowly fading out about us. Steve Jones has people chasing him, I am not going to lie there is a group of rich & powerful people who have had enough of this person. I will help them as much as I can. I already have. I think we can tell whats been written proves people who were close to him are going to expose, I'm not sure who Keith is or how people know he drove a citreon & his wife didn't live with him but its fair to say if you read badbiz.co.uk he calls pretty much everybody he comes into contact with a scam. He was happy to host his website with a "scam" company untill he broke their terms & now he's calling them. He has brainwashed Tom Faulkner (who has made 150+ comments about my company) who now is clutching at straws changing documents on paint to make us look like liars when in reality, we all know this individual is full of non-sense. This he has learned from Badbiz no doubt, who claims I have registered as a member on his porn site. We have all seen the proof of him pretending to be other people and I think he is at it again. It seems as though suddenly all the people who he has lied about are now taking revenge & I have already publicly said I would be very very surprised if Steve has the brains or the money to make that happen, for the record of all the people he has being saying "take me to court" to have only not taken him because he has no money. Me included! Please ignore these two as the lies are unbelievable.

If any customers or potential customers would like to get in touch please do so. In our 12+ years of online experience, we have never encountered such a strange & malicious individual and please have a look at all the press about him - do not judge us by the lies on here.
Also a massive thank you to all supporting clients who have commented & messaged the offenders we appreciate your loyalty & will continue to provide our high level of service & customer care.

Kind Regards
Tom McVey

28-07-2011: How stupid does The Social Media People think its customers and critics are?

Tom McVey claims I am posting documents altered to give a false impression. I am not.

My opinion, and the opinion or claims of Tom McVey can be ignored; because everyone can check the original, indisputable evidence for themselves.
EVERYONE who reads this forum can, if they wish, check with the official government body ‘Companies House’. Everyone can, if they wish, download the Certificates of Incorporation for the 3 criminal companies named.
Everyone can see that the documents published on this forum show exactly what is held at Companies House.

Therefore anyone who disbelieves this post, and the previous one, about the magic of Tom Mcvey having 2 different birthdays, is ignoring objective, independent, verifiable evidence.

Here is a different version (from Companies House list of Directors details).

Therefore Tom McVey has once again proved, from his own mouth (or keyboard), he is lying.

Stephen Jones works/worked for Yes Loans - give it a quick Google and you'll see exactly what kind of person you're dealing with here! So he's hoping to win £48, 000 in compensation from TSMP... bless him for trying. God loves a trier.

Awww Badbiz and TomFaulkner I actually love you both lol this forum is a godsend thank god it appears pretty high on google due to all the traffic... McVey (Junior/Senior/Camilla/Dampman/SteveJones/JasonBarkerSmith/Whatever you're using just now) you clearly need to slander other businesses and tell lots of lies in order to get your point across it's a wee shame. :) Aw well. Hope you go down like a sack of ### you cost me a small fortune as well as numerous sleepless nights.

Hi Clive,

Can you be more specific as I can't find anything linking them. If all this is true do you think that most of us on here would feel it any worse than some have experienced at the hands of TSMP? Just think how it looks.

28-07-2011: The Social Media People's Neil McVey is also a 'double-birthday' boy!

Perhaps Tom McVey thought that since his Dad, Neil McVey lies to government authorities he might as well 'follow in father's footsteps'. It could explain why they are both shown to lie to Companies House.

Yes - Neil McVey also claims to have 2 different birthdays. So even in this Tom McVey can't claim any originality.

If they lie to the authorities why would anyone expect them to be truthful on this forum, or indeed with individual customers who provide the funds for their crooked enterprises?

You're right Camilla! It has to be him... He is the only Stephen Jones... EVER. IN THE WHOLE WORLD. Seems you lot seem to think the more personal slander and swearwords you use the more right you are. Why don't you shut up and learn to spell stupid you're only embarassing yourself and lowering the rep of this rat company further.

28-07-2011: The Social Media People is ‘Not Known Here’!

(Some of you will remember Steven Jackson, the big-shot Director of Customer Service for TSMP. who was desperate to ‘help’ everyone to appreciate what a wonderful company he worked for – from his suite of offices at 4th Floor, Albany House, Regent St. London. He urged people to contact him there. It is SUCH an important address; even TSMPs Registered Office Address was moved there from the back streets of Manchester, 17 March.)

Every Ltd. company operating in England and Wales is legally obliged to have a functioning ‘Registered Office Address’ and to have its name legibly displayed at that address.

If the Tax authorities or Companies House need to write, or any legal documents need to be delivered it’s the ‘Registered Office Address’ where letters are sent. Or of course – interested parties, (e.g. customers, journalists, investors) can make contact there.

SUCH an important place! So -What happens if a correctly addressed letter is sent to the Registered Office Address of The Social Media People, and Headquarters to its vast Customer Service Department?

It is ‘returned to sender’! ‘Not Known Here’.

Yet again – The Social Media People commits criminal offences. It has no functioning Registered Office Address. (Please don’t take my word for it; feel free to check for yourself. Reference: Statutory Instruments, 2008 No. 495, COMPANIES, The Companies (Trading Disclosures) Regulations 2008. 9 & 10 also 3)

(Attached - FACTS, not unsubstantiated claims or abuse. Evidence, not conjecture. Test the truth - send a letter.)