American Board of Medical Specialties
Reviews and Complaints

American Board of Medical Specialties

What must happen at the American Board of Medical Specialties on or after September 17, 2022?

1. Susan C. Morris must resign or be terminated from services.

How did Susan C. Morris become the Associate Vice President of Communications of the American Board of Medical Specialties when she does not have the skills of a desk clerk?

Who was the supervisor of Susan C. Morris on September 14, 2022?

How did such an unreasonable, prejudiced, and rude communicator as Susan C. Morris get a job at the American Board of Medical Specialties?

Susan C. Morris has been assigned to manage and decide specific physician issues: Is it justified?

A competent and experienced specific physician who can guide many specific physicians must respond to specific physician issues: What did you understand?

What did you understand from Dr. Asif Qureshi after reading the research facts he has compiled over the last 22 years in Chicago, Illinois, United States, which can be viewed at www.qureshiuniversity.com/physicians.html?

Who was behind her getting the job and what favors have been given to place Susan C. Morris unfairly?

Resignation or termination of Susan C. Morris after September 17, 2022: What did you understand?

Who has done contact tracing for Susan C. Morris?

Who must do contact tracing for Susan C. Morris?

What jail location must Susan C. Morris go to?

2. ABMS President and Chief Executive Officer Richard E. Hawkins, MD, should be terminated from services on or after September 17, 2022.

This must be communicated to all.

How did you verify that this person is not prejudiced and/or incompetent relevant to his job?

What is fidelity?

What are conjugal rights?

Do you have the choice to violate the rights of others?

Do you have the choice to harm others?

Can anyone violate the rights of others, harm others, and make silly, unreasonable statements as a personal choice/freedom?

What did you understand from this complaint: www.nazianazirqazi.org?

ABMS President and Chief Executive Officer Richard E. Hawkins, MD, should be terminated from services on or after September 17, 2022. Further punishments are possible as harms unfold.

3. Peter Hotez, MD, should be terminated from services on or after September 17, 2022.

Molecular Virology & Microbiology

Did he answer all relevant virology questions on or before May 20, 2022?

No

Is continuing in this job on or after May 30, 2022, justified?

No.

Virology physician and researcher

What is a serotype?

Serotypes refer to separate groups within a species of microorganisms that all share a similar characteristic.

Are you are virologist?

Are you ready to answer questions relevant to your job?

What were the causes of the 2019 to 2022 viral pandemic?

Is this a mutated influenza virus, rhinovirus, picornavirus, adenovirus, human respiratory syncytial virus, enterovirus, or human coronavirus with serotypes?

How do you scientifically prove it is a mutated influenza virus, rhinovirus, picornavirus, adenovirus, human respiratory syncytial virus, enterovirus, or human coronavirus with serotypes?

What are the respiratory problems associated with most of the viruses? These may include coughing, sore throat, runny nose, sneezing, headache, and fever.

How are allergic rhinitis, bronchitis, bronchiolitis, pertussis, sinusitis, and upper respiratory track viral infection different?

There are at least 200 virus strains implicated in causing the common cold, with rhinoviruses, coronaviruses, adenoviruses, and enteroviruses being the most common.

If existing individuals claiming to be virologists answer these questions, they should show where they have answered these questions. They must resign on or after May 30, 2022, if they are not able to answer these questions.

Matters related to enlisting all entities who received grants for virology and how they answered these questions.

Stop their grants on or after September 17, 2022, for failing to answer questions relevant to their jobs.

4. Humayun Chaudhry, DO, MACP President and CEO of the Federation of State Medical Boards, should be terminated from services on or after September 17, 2022.

What are the details of his family members and assets?

Who has done contact tracing for this person?

Who must do contact tracing for this person?

Is this person an ethical or unethical person?

If he would have been an ethical person, these questions would not have been there. If others would not have been harmed by their unethical activities, these questions would not have been there.

If he displays credentials from New York University, New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine, Harvard, etc., it does not mean anything to others if he does not answer specific questions circulated relevant to his professional services.

Did you get a complaint from Dr. Asif Qureshi relevant to professional services of the organization you represented on May 8, 2022?

Where is research from Humayun Chaudhry displayed on or after May 30, 2022, in a question-and-answer format that is freely available via the internet for other specific physicians in the same way Dr. Asif Qureshi has displayed his work for at least 70 types of physicians at www.qureshiuniversity.com/physicians.html, which took him 22 years of research in Chicago, Illinois, United States?

A woman will give Humayun Chaudhry sexual favors to exclude other males from ABMS presentations and certification: Is this ethical behavior?

Who is responsible for overseeing these harms?

Humayun Chaudhry: What do you consider an ethical behavior relevant to Humayun Chaudhry?

What are examples of unethical behavior from this person in this situation?

Humayun Chaudhry: What is his family background?

Who from law enforcement must do contact tracing for Humayun Chaudhry for the last 35 years?

5. Marianne Gausche-Hill, MD, President of the American Board of Emergency Medicine, should be terminated from services on or after September 17, 2022.

Who has done contact tracing for this person?

Who must do contact tracing for this person?

Marianne Gausche-Hill will engage in sexual activities at one location and get favors for these activities, such as a salary and the job of President of American Board of Emergency Medicine, while excluding others from presentations and certification: Is this ethical behavior from her?

She will have sex with them so they arrange a salary and job title of President of American Board of Emergency Medicine for her. This is unethical behavior.

Who is responsible for doing contact tracing for Marianne Gausche-Hill and profiling her unethical behavior?

What are examples of unethical behavior from Marianne Gausche-Hill toward the services or assigned work of the person?

6. Many more will be added.

http://www.nazianazirqazi.org

Reopen case number 06-2655. This is among the 10 issues elaborated on. Dr. Asif Qureshi, a medical doctor, is facing the deprivation of his rights under the color of law, discrimination, exclusion, and intentional harms. I was given an assignment by Social Security to list my soft skills and hard skills. I have done my part. The same information was transferred to the Illinois Department of Human Services. This was and is the Ticket to Work program.

Retroactive relief is due to Dr. Asif Qureshi (www.qureshiuniversity.com/physicians.html), who has spent 22 years conducting research in Chicago, Illinois, United States but has faced the deprivation of his rights under the color of law, prejudice, discrimination, and exclusion, including from the American Board of Medical Specialties, 353 North Clark Street, Suite 1400, Chicago IL 60654.

Ten billion dollars in damages must be collected from all identified wrongdoers.

A conservative physician group has filed an antitrust suit against the American Board of Medical Specialties in federal court, claiming its board recertification program is "a money-making, self-enrichment scheme" that reduces patient access to physicians.

The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) filed its lawsuit Tuesday in U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, seeking to end the ABMS' sometimes criticized Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program, according to its 20-page complaint.

The Tucson, Ariz.-based AAPS, representing a New Jersey physician in its suit, said the ABMS program offers "no benefit to patient care" and violates antitrust laws by having worked with the Joint Commission since 2009 to require physicians to obtain MOC in order to renew hospital medical staff privileges. Health insurers also use ABMS' board certification as a recognition of credentials, the lawsuit states.

"There is no justification for requiring the purchase of [ABMS]' product as a condition of practicing medicine or being on hospital medical staffs, yet ABMS has agreed with others to cause exclusion of physicians who do not purchase or comply with [its] program, " the complaint stated. "Defendant's program is a money-making, self-enrichment scheme that reduces the supply of hospital-based physicians and decreases the time physicians have available for patients."

ABMS works with 24 specialty boards, which cover nearly every medical specialty, to develop recertification programs and promote continuous professional development. Those 24 boards aren't named in the lawsuit.

MOC requires most certified specialists seek recertification -- typically every 10 years -- by successfully completing a four-part assessment. The program started in 2000 but recertification has accelerated since 2009.

AAPS said in the lawsuit it seeks to stop the MOC program from continuing, end "misrepresentations" about doctors who decline the program, and receive a refund of fees paid by its members for MOC-related activities.

MOC Evidence Slow, but Coming, ABMS Says

ABMS hadn't yet seen the AAPS lawsuit as of late Wednesday. "Until we see a lawsuit, there's no comment we could make, " ABMS spokeswoman Karen Metropulos told MedPage Today.

However, the group defended its MOC program, saying in an eight-page "myths and facts" document posted March 20 on its website that the program is "anchored in evidence-based guidelines, national clinical and quality standards, and specialty best practices."

"Because the MOC program is relatively new (as it has been introduced gradually during the past decade), we don't yet have evidence that results from decades of gathering data, but the data are emerging, " the ABMS said. "Early studies show a link between MOC and improved clinical performance and outcomes by participating physicians."

As further support of its MOC, Metropulos pointed to ABMS' "evidence library" which has compiled nearly 50 peer-reviewed articles related to the MOC process.

More than 450, 000 physicians participate in the MOC program, which ABMS says is to help assure a doctor has successfully completed a rigorous evaluation process and assures competency. The pool grows by roughly 50, 000 physicians a year.

AAPS said every state licenses physicians to practice medicine, and patients have a right to seek care from any of them. The group said ABMS' work with the Federation of State Medical Boards for maintenance of licensure as a requirement of state licensure was a further antitrust violation.

ABMS' "actions have no legitimate purpose and reduce the supply of physicians available to treat patients in various settings, " the lawsuit said.

The MOC "program imposes far greater burdens than any analogous program in any other profession, and surveys demonstrate that an overwhelming majority of physicians – perhaps more than 90% – feel that this program is unjustified, " the complaint stated, referencing a 2012 survey of its members.

The lawsuit cites the "unjustified exclusion" of an AAPS member with 29 years' experience -- identified only as "J.E." in the complaint -- from the medical staff at Somerset Medical Center in Somerville, N.J. The physician wasn't allowed on the medical staff in 2011 until he had been certified by the American Board of Family Medicine.

Recertification would have exceeded 100 hours for a typical physician, "thousands of dollars in fees and travel expenses, " and time away from patients. Furthermore, the American Board of Internal Medicine earlier this month told physicians it "is requiring more frequent participation in MOC of all board-certified physicians, " the lawsuit noted.

MOC Draws Fire from Docs

Physician concerns about MOC expense and the time-consuming process involved were noted in a December 2012 New England Journal of Medicine health policy report.

Robert Baron, MD, medical professor at the University of California, San Francisco, and journalist John Iglehart noted the low number of "grandfathered" specialists -- those certified before 1990 and granted time-unlimited credentials -- as evidence.

Only 1% of nearly 67, 000 such physicians holding only time-unlimited certificates from the American Board of Internal Medicine have been re-certified through MOC, they said in the December piece.

MOC fees charged by boards over a 10-year period range from $4, 820 from the American Board of Plastic Surgery to $1, 250 from the American Board of Surgery, the authors noted.

ABMS said its fees average roughly $300 per year.

The MOC recertification process is complicated, and Baron and Iglehart note that if it went away it could be replaced by a more burdensome system to assure physicians competency.

"If that is indeed the case, the ABMS and its boards must actively (and transparently) respond to the MOC concerns of all physicians, young and old alike, and accelerate its collaborative efforts with external organizations as they strive to navigate a complex system that melds professionalism, government regulation, and market forces, " Baron and Iglehart wrote.

This week's action against ABMS isn't the first dramatic step taken by AAPS, which was formed in 1943 to preserve the private practice of medicine, according to its website. The organization was one of the first to file a lawsuit against the Affordable Care Act in March 2010, claiming it was unconstitutional, and also sued then-First Lady Hillary Clinton in 1993 over her handling of the Clinton administration's health reform task force. It also broke stance with other medical organizations to support the patent protection of isolated genes in recent Supreme Court oral arguments.