Menu
For Business Write a review File a complaint
Scott Veerkamp Customer Service Phone, Email, Contacts

Scott Veerkamp
Reviews and Complaints

scottveerkamp.com

Learn how the rating is calculated

1.0 6 Complaints
Claim Your Business
Take control of your profile: address complaints and engage with reviews
Write a review File a complaint

Scott Veerkamp Complaints 6

ComplaintsBoard
J
8:36 pm EST
Verified customer This complaint was posted by a verified customer. Learn more

Scott Veerkamp Scott Veerkamp Financial Harm

Scott Veerkamp used Yield Spread Premium to receive kickbacks from lenders. Ask Scott to return the kickbacks he collected on predatory loans.

The financial benefit of Yield Spread Premium belongs to the client...

You can find Yield Spread Premium on the settlement statement in your mortgage documents. It will be listed as P.O.C. or paid "outside of closing." This shows the dollar amount of the kickback your broker received for inflating your interest rate.

The Center for Responsible Lending estimates excessive interest rates cost families $2.9 billion each year. Please take time to review the following information regarding Yield Spread Premium and Loan Steering...

YouTube Video: Yield Spread Premium...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iPXsKygQSRc

YSP and the Center for Responsible Lending:
http://www.responsiblelending.org/mortgage-lending/research-analysis/ib-ysp-110507-final.pdf

CRL and Equity Theft:
http://www.responsiblelending.org/mortgage-lending/tools-resources/ib011-YSP_Equity_Theft-0604.pdf

Predatory Lending and the National Association of Realtors:
http://www.zimbio.com/Exposing+Scams/articles/15VN_4Q6HLA/NAR+Predatory+Lending+Information

CRL: Seven Signs of Predatory Lending
http://www.zimbio.com/Exposing+Scams/articles/AKevJQHWOKO/Center+Responsible+Lending+Seven+Signs+Predatory

Read full review of Scott Veerkamp and 1 comment
Hide full review
1 comment
Add a comment
J
J
Joheane
US
Send a message
Aug 17, 2012 8:50 am EDT

The Center for Responsible Lending says YSP "steals equity from struggling families." NAR members have hurt consumers with kickbacks on predatory loans. Please ask Scott Veerkamp to stop scamming the public with "Bait and Switch" tactics. Clearly, inflated interest rates do not "protect the interest of the public."

ComplaintsBoard
J
10:00 pm EDT
Verified customer This complaint was posted by a verified customer. Learn more

Scott Veerkamp Scott Veerkamp: Franklin Township Bus Fees

Scott Veerkamp is the President of the Franklin Township School Board. In addition, Scott is a member of the CIESC Advisory Council. Clearly, this is a huge "conflict of interest" for three specific reasons...

1. CIESC is collecting fees on (school buses) already paid for with Franklin Township tax dollars. In other words, parents are being DOUBLE TAXED for their children's transportation to school.

2. As many people know, Scott Veerkamp OWES MONEY in back taxes.

3. Given this information, why are the residents of Franklin Township being DOUBLE TAXED by a School Board President that refuses to pay his own taxes?

Important video to review:
http://www.fox59.com/videobeta/?watchId=74ac22d9-a496-474a-a630-0c8c5159e6e7

Scott Veerkamp: Unpaid taxes..
http://hadenoughindy.blogspot.com/2010/11/elected-officials-who-didnt-pay-their.html

Conflict of interest:
http://www.ftcsc.k12.in.us/board/

Sign petition:
http://www.noschoolbustax.com/

Lawsuit:
http://www.ibj.com/indiana-school-district-that-ended-bus-routes-faces-lawsuit/PARAMS/article/30512

Read full review of Scott Veerkamp
Hide full review
ComplaintsBoard
J
9:48 pm EDT
Verified customer This complaint was posted by a verified customer. Learn more

Scott Veerkamp Franklin Township Bus Fees

Scott Veerkamp is the President of the Franklin Township School Board. In addition, Scott is a member of the CIESC Advisory Council. Clearly, this is a huge "conflict of interest" for three specific reasons...

1. CIESC is collecting fees on (school buses) already paid for with Franklin Township tax dollars. In other words, parents are being DOUBLE TAXED for their children's transportation to school.

2. As many people know, Scott Veerkamp OWES MONEY in back taxes.

3. Given this information, why are the residents of Franklin Township being DOUBLE TAXED by a School Board President that refuses to pay his own taxes?

Important video to review:
http://www.fox59.com/videobeta/?watchId=74ac22d9-a496-474a-a630-0c8c5159e6e7

Scott Veerkamp: Unpaid taxes..
http://hadenoughindy.blogspot.com/2010/11/elected-officials-who-didnt-pay-their.html

Conflict of interest:
http://www.ftcsc.k12.in.us/board/

Sign petition:
http://www.noschoolbustax.com/

Read full review of Scott Veerkamp
Hide full review

Is Scott Veerkamp Legit?

Scott Veerkamp earns a trustworthiness rating of 91%

Highly recommended, but caution will not hurt.

Our conclusion: After a detailed review, ComplaintsBoard finds Scott Veerkamp to be a trustworthy company. Although there's a 0% resolution rate for customer complaints, which deserves attention, Scott Veerkamp is known for their high standards and safety. If you're thinking about dealing with Scott Veerkamp, it's wise to check how they handle complaints.

We found clear and detailed contact information for Scott Veerkamp. The company provides a physical address, phone number, and email, as well as 3 social media accounts. This demonstrates a commitment to customer service and transparency, which is a positive sign for building trust with customers.

A long registered date for scottveerkamp.com can be seen as a positive aspect for Scott Veerkamp as it indicates a commitment to maintaining the website and its domain name for a long period of time. It also suggests that the company is organized and has taken steps to secure its online presence.

The age of Scott Veerkamp's domain suggests that they have had sufficient time to establish a reputation as a reliable source of information and services. This can provide reassurance to potential customers seeking quality products or services.

Scottveerkamp.com has been deemed safe to visit, as it is protected by a cloud-based cybersecurity solution that uses the Domain Name System (DNS) to help protect networks from online threats.

However ComplaintsBoard has detected that:

  • While Scott Veerkamp has a high level of trust, our investigation has revealed that the company's complaint resolution process is inadequate and ineffective. As a result, only 0% of 6 complaints are resolved. The support team may have poor customer service skills, lack of training, or not be well-equipped to handle customer complaints.
  • Scottveerkamp.com has relatively low traffic compared to other websites, it could be due to a niche focus, but could also indicate a potential lack of traffic and popularity. The scottveerkamp.com may offer a niche product or service that is only of interest to a smaller audience.
  • We detected that scottveerkamp.com is missing an SSL certificate, which is a cause for concern. Without an SSL certificate, the website may not be taking adequate steps to protect users' sensitive information. This can increase the risk of intercepted data being used for malicious purposes.
ComplaintsBoard
J
9:59 pm EDT
Verified customer This complaint was posted by a verified customer. Learn more

Scott Veerkamp Angie's list: scott veerkamp / predatory broker

Please review this information from U.S. Senator Jeff Merkley regarding deceptive lending practices. Senator Merkley makes the following statement in his letter to the President:
"Steering payments were made to brokers who enticed unsuspecting homeowners into deceptive and expensive mortgages. These secret bonus payments, often called yield spread premiums, turned home mortgages into a SCAM."

In addition, Senator Merkley references an article in the New York Times entitled "Predatory Brokers." The article makes two important statements regarding predatory lending: 1. "The first step must be to outlaw the kickbacks that lenders pay brokers for steering clients into costlier loans." 2. "The most clearly unethical form of payment is the so-called yield spread premium."

NAR members are supposed to help their clients avoid predatory lending tactics. The code of ethics requires them to follow the "Golden Rule" in the representation of their clients.

If Scott Veerkamp was applying for a loan, would he select a mortgage that is loaded with yield spread premium and junk fees? The answer to this question is obvious. Unfortunately, Scott refuses to comply with the "do unto others" philosophy in the code of ethics. He uses NAR as a selling tool to build trust with his clients. After gaining trust, he "blindsides" his clients with YSP so he can receive a kickback on their loan.

This concept is called "steering" and it can be very costly for consumers. No one would agree to a higher interest rate if they understood the financial impact it was having on their loan. This is why Senator Merkley refers to yield spread premium as a "secret bonus payment."

Please take a moment to review two examples of predatory lending using YSP and junk fees:
Loan 1: (Property value $150, 000) A. $4, 799 yield spread premium B. $500 processing fee C. $250 document preparation fee D. $50 courier fee E. $35 electronic filing fee F. $425 administration fee (lender fee)

Loan 2: (Property value $120, 000) A. $1, 440 yield spread premium B. $960 application fee C. $1, 920 in "discount points" (paid to Scott Veerkamp) D. $409 administration fee (lender fee) E. $150 underwriting fee (lender fee)
I have provided documentation Scott collected nearly $10, 000 on two separate mortgages using YSP and junk fees. This is an average of $5, 000 per loan. This type of lending represents the extreme opposite of "protecting the interest of the client."

As I mentioned earlier, predatory lending can cause serious financial harm to the unsuspecting public. Therefore, I agree with Senator Merkley when he says yield spread premium has turned the home mortgage industry into a "SCAM."

Read full review of Scott Veerkamp
Hide full review
ComplaintsBoard
J
10:52 pm EDT
Verified customer This complaint was posted by a verified customer. Learn more

Scott Veerkamp FTCSC: Scott Veerkamp Owes Money

Re: Scott Veerkamp / Franklin Township Community School Corporation

Loan Steering. The Center for Responsible Lending estimates that excessive interest rates cost families $2.9 billion each year. CRL states: "When a borrower loses a home to foreclosure, society pays the price in the drop in surrounding property values and LOST TAX REVENUES."

1. Here is the formula: Yield Spread Premium and excessive interest rates = loss of tax revenues from mortgage defaults. 2. Clearly, this is one of the reasons for the lack of funding in our school systems. 3. I find it Ironic that Scott Veerkamp has not paid his taxes and FTCSC wants to sue the state over a "funding formula." 4. In other words, Scott wants taxpayers to pay for the lawsuit going in---and Scott feels no responsibility to pay his own taxes going out. 5. On a scale of 1-10 Scott Veerkamp's level of integrity is at ZERO.

Please note: On November 5, 2010 Scott Veerkamp gave people the impression my complaints had "done nothing but strengthen his business." If his business is strong, why does Scott owe $7, 632 in back taxes? In other words, Scott says his real estate business is STRONG going in---and Scott claims he can not afford to pay his taxes going out. Does this "Bait and Switch" tactic sound familiar?

Please take time to review the articles below...

http://hadenoughindy.blogspot.com/2010/11/elected-officials-who-didnt-pay-their.html

http://jmb27.posterous.com/warning-letter-to-scott-veerkamp

http://www.wthr.com/story/12029420/growing-school-districts-suing-over-funding

Read full review of Scott Veerkamp
Hide full review
ComplaintsBoard
J
9:10 pm EDT

Scott Veerkamp Scam

Please take time to review 3 exhibits (below)…

I had a phone conversation with David Bickell regarding Scott Veerkamp. David told me I should contact Jonathan D. Nicholas at REMAX of Indiana to review my complaint.

I filed several written complaints with REMAX of Indiana and REMAX International. In fact, I stopped at the REMAX regional office on three seperate occaisions to speak with Janie Monroe about my situation.

I told her I wanted to schedule a meeting with Jonathan D. Nicholas to discuss my complaint against Scott Veerkamp. My complaint included documentation of Loan Steering and Predatory Lending with REMAX Central. Nonetheless, Jonathan refused to meet with me and discuss my experience with the “REMAX Central Sting Operation.”

To my knowledge, REMAX did nothing to prevent Scott Veerkamp from preying on the unsuspecting public. Instead, REMAX decided to honor Scott with a “Lifetime Achievement Award” for his effort in misrepresenting the public.

Read full review of Scott Veerkamp
Hide full review

Scott Veerkamp Reviews 0

Looks like Scott Veerkamp has no reviews yet.
Write a review
Subscribe to receive notifications of all new customer feedback

If you represent Scott Veerkamp, take charge of your business profile by claiming it and stay informed about any new reviews or complaints submitted.

👉 Claim your business

Overview of Scott Veerkamp complaint handling

Scott Veerkamp reviews first appeared on Complaints Board on Mar 17, 2011. The latest review Scott Veerkamp Financial Harm was posted on Jan 29, 2012. Scott Veerkamp has an average consumer rating of 1 stars from 6 reviews. Scott Veerkamp has resolved 0 complaints.
Trust badge
Collect Your Trust Badge
Be recognized for outstanding customer service
  1. Scott Veerkamp Contacts

  2. Scott Veerkamp phone numbers
    +1 (317) 446-9398
    +1 (317) 446-9398
    Click up if you have successfully reached Scott Veerkamp by calling +1 (317) 446-9398 phone number 0 0 users reported that they have successfully reached Scott Veerkamp by calling +1 (317) 446-9398 phone number Click down if you have unsuccessfully reached Scott Veerkamp by calling +1 (317) 446-9398 phone number 0 0 users reported that they have UNsuccessfully reached Scott Veerkamp by calling +1 (317) 446-9398 phone number
  3. Scott Veerkamp emails
  4. Scott Veerkamp address
    4855 S Emerson Ave. № 102, Indianapolis, Indiana, 46203, United States
  5. Scott Veerkamp social media
  6. Rachel
    Checked and verified by Rachel This contact information is personally checked and verified by the ComplaintsBoard representative. Learn more
    May 24, 2024
  7. View all Scott Veerkamp contacts

Our Commitment

We stand for unbiased reviews

We make sure all complaints and reviews are from real people sharing genuine experiences.

We help resolving issues

We offer easy tools for businesses and reviewers to solve issues together. Learn how it works.

We advocate freedom of speech

We support and promote the right for reviewers to express their opinions and ideas freely without censorship or restrictions, as long as it's respectful and within our Terms and Conditions, of course ;)

We ensure transparent and fair ratings

Our rating system is open and honest, ensuring unbiased evaluations for all businesses on the platform. Learn more.

We care about your privacy

Personal details of reviewers are strictly confidential and hidden from everyone.

We are easy, free and open to everyone

Our website is designed to be user-friendly, accessible, and absolutely free for everyone to use.