ResearchGate’s earns a 1.0-star rating from 4 reviews, showing that the majority of academic users are dissatisfied with networking and research-sharing experience.
- All
- Reviews only
- Complaints only
- Resolved
- Unresolved
- Replied by the business
- Unreplied
- With attachments
Membership registration
Dear Sirs,
I have two issues I would like to address:
1. I have tried to register for an account without success - Company email or NGO address not accepted.
I own and operate an experiential education company in Thailand, and have been bringing in International school and university groups for - service learning and study programmes in northern Thailand (reforestation, sustainable agriculture, small construction projects in rural schools, since 1986. Projects are funded and worked on by our clients and donors.
We have just established a 3rd centre in Sam Roi Yot. (Gulf of Thailand) As an ex-oilfield diver, I am interested in developing coastal restoration projects in the Gulf of Thailand and need access to related information and academics active in that area, in order to establish research connections, and contribute data gathered.
2. You have for years sent me notifications of related articles published by an E.S. BEARY (not me), and despite several requests for an introduction I have yet to get a response.
I am really keen to move forward and would much appreciate your help.
Regards
Shane K Beary
www.track-of-the-tiger.com
www.volunteers-without-borders.org
Co-author name wrongly listed in my research gate publication
Respected Sir/Madam
I am [edited] recently completed my PhD from the Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal. As a continuation of my PhD topic, with the guidance from my mentors, I have published an internal technical report in research gate. The link of the same is as given below.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361115402_A_note_on_the_examination_of_the_possibility_to_interpolate_the_covariance_uncertainty_matrix_in_nuclear_data_science
One of the co-authors in this report is Santhi Sheela Yerraguntla. She has accepted her co-authorship. But there is an unknown co-author mentioned in the report profile as 'Yerraguntla'.
May I kindly request you to help me delete the co-authorship named 'Yerraguntla'. I would be grateful to you in this regard.
Thanking you
Sincerely
[edited]
Desired outcome: My desired outcome is to delete one of the coauthorship named 'Yerraguntla' listed in my technical report published recently this June, 2022.
Kindly hide the complaint given about the research gate document from google. Donot highlight it in the google page.
Metrics fraud on researchgate
Dear Sirs:
ResearchGate (RG) provides common metrics for its many published articles. These metrics include Reads, Recommendations, Citations, Comments, Research Interest (RI) for papers, Total Research Interest (TRI) for authors, RG Score, etc.
There is obviously a deliberate ongoing effort to provide inflated and fraudulent metrics on RG. A network of fraudsters provides fake Reads and Recommendations, probably for money.
Perhaps the best example is a non-refereed arcane quantum physics preprint written by Andrea Rossi: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long-range_particle_interactions. This truly bizarre and nonsensical preprint has somehow accumulated over 66, 000 Reads and over 700 Recommendations while never being cited by anyone in 2.5 years.
Rossi is a self-confessed "cold fusion" fraudster who now claims to have invented devices that run on "zero-point energy" (ZPE). Almost all physicists consider such devices to be physically impossible.
I have apprised RG of this obvious metrics fraud and they have done nothing to stop it. Rossi uses the fake RG metrics to provide credibility for his "Energy Catalyzer" ("E-Cat") fraud scheme. His current "product" is a lamp that purportedly runs on ZPE: https://ecat.com/.
RG has aided and abetted Rossi's E-Cat fraud scheme by allowing him to extensively revise his preprint in DEC 2020 even though the original preprint had a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number issued in JAN 2019. RG issued a new DOI (old DOI +1) and allowed Rossi to retain all the old phony "Reads" and "Recommendations" metrics. This is a direct violation of RG's own policies regarding preprints and DOI issuance.
Rossi is a 71-year-old ex-convict who has no engineering or science degree whatsoever. He is totally unqualified to post such a paper on RG, and he lied about his academic qualifications to obtain his RG membership. His RG profile states that he is a "Doctor" ("Dr") but he has no doctoral degree. I have repeatedly informed RG of Rossi's academic credential fraud and they have done nothing about it.
Thank you for your consideration and assistance.
I can provide more detailed information on Rossi and RG upon request.
Desired outcome: Investigation of metrics fraud on RG; Corrective action to prevent metrics fraud on RG
The Italian mafia framed Rossi, to successfully gain control of his plastics and oil recycling business. They opened a valve on a storage tank that allowed its contents to be released into a nearby river, which clean up cost many millions. That supposed pollution, in which he played no part, is what got him jailed. Rossi was later exonerated of any wrong doing when the judge who jailed him was replaced by a more independent minded judge. Cherry picking data to denigrate someone, shows who is the culprit this time.
You understand that my comment deals primarily with the grotesque metrics fraud associated with Rossi's "papers" on ResearchGate (RG), right? You can tell because the title says "ResearchGate - Metrics Fraud on ResearchGate." As for your priceless comment, Rossi has NO PH.D. and NO engineering or science degree whatsoever. He falsely claims to have a "Ph.D." in Philosophy on RG: www.researchgate.net/profile/Andrea-Rossi-56. THAT, my friend, is academic credential fraud and a direct violation of the RG Terms of Service.
As for your maudlin story, I relied on the following website for information on Rossi's extensive criminal background in Italy: news.newenergytimes.net/2012/03/10/rossis-financial-and-environmental-criminal-history. That information has been posted on the web for at least 10 years. If you or Rossi have a problem with it or believe your fantasy to be a more accurate representation of the facts, then you are surely welcome to take it up with them.
Is ResearchGate Legit?
ResearchGate earns a trustworthiness rating of 91%
Highly recommended, but caution will not hurt.
We found clear and detailed contact information for ResearchGate. The company provides a physical address, phone number, and 2 emails, as well as 3 social media accounts. This demonstrates a commitment to customer service and transparency, which is a positive sign for building trust with customers.
Researchgate.net has a valid SSL certificate, which indicates that the website is secure and trustworthy. Look for the padlock icon in the browser and the "https" prefix in the URL to confirm that the website is using SSL.
Several positive reviews for ResearchGate have been found on various review sites. While this may be a good sign, it is important to approach these reviews with caution and consider the possibility of fake or biased reviews.
We looked up ResearchGate and found that the website is receiving a high amount of traffic. This could be a sign of a popular and trustworthy website, but it is still important to exercise caution and verify the legitimacy of the site before sharing any personal or financial information
However ComplaintsBoard has detected that:
- We conducted a search on social media and found several negative reviews related to ResearchGate. These reviews may indicate issues with the company's products, services, or customer support. It is important to thoroughly research the company and its offerings before making any purchases to avoid any potential risks.
criminal enterprise stealing copyrights from the scientists
Since the current CEO of RG (the Muslim Mastrich, a virologist, not a physician) received 52 million cash from Bill Gates, he commenced to any type of bold and criminal acts against the subscribers.
In current vicious feud with another research social media portal (academia.edu), Researchgate suspends the accounts of prominent scientists who have trusted that site their publications, and keeps their intellectual property to sell it later for cheaper prices than those the scientific journals offers for non-free-for-access (NOFA) articles. This is a criminal enterprise.
I suggest all concerned scientists remove their full-texts of books and articles from Rseearchgate.net and drop out until it is not late.
Researchgate is currently engaged in copyright infringment crimes. We have reported this crime to the appropriate agencies. This criminal enterprise should be vanished. Bill Gates must know whom he sponsors, and if he knows and it is okay with RG's crimes, then it makes him a criminal.
In current vicious feud with another research social media portal (academia.edu), Researchgate suspends the accounts of prominent scientists who have trusted it their publications, and keeps their intellectual property to sell those later for cheaper prices than the journals like Springer or Willey offer for their truly owned not-free-for-access (NOFA) articles. RG is a criminal enterprise.
I suggest all concerned scientists remove their full-texts of books and articles from Rseearchgate.net and drop out until it is not too late.
www.Researchgate is currently engaged in copyright infringement crimes. It blocks the profiles, suspends the profiles of scientists who have over 100 publications shared in RG, and still keeps their works for its financial gain (without the scientists's knowledge). We have reported this crime to the appropriate agencies. This criminal enterprise (RG) should be vanished as not it got to the wrong direction. Bill Gates must know whom he has sponsored, and if he knows all and is silent like a cricket, then it makes him a criminal too.
Hello. This is Dr Masoud Parsinejad from University of Tehran, Iran.
My emai address in the researchgate system has been saved as
parsinejad@ut.ac.ir,
the extrs comma at the end prevents the system to contact me. Can you please correct this problem.
Thanks
Masoud Parsinejad
parsinejad@ut.ac.ir (with no comma at the end :) )
ResearchGate Reviews 0
If you represent ResearchGate, take charge of your business profile by claiming it and stay informed about any new reviews or complaints submitted.
Overview of ResearchGate complaint handling
-
ResearchGate Contacts
-
ResearchGate phone numbers+49 302 0005 1001+49 302 0005 1001Click up if you have successfully reached ResearchGate by calling +49 302 0005 1001 phone number 0 0 users reported that they have successfully reached ResearchGate by calling +49 302 0005 1001 phone number Click down if you have unsuccessfully reached ResearchGate by calling +49 302 0005 1001 phone number 0 0 users reported that they have UNsuccessfully reached ResearchGate by calling +49 302 0005 1001 phone number
-
ResearchGate emailssupport@researchgate.net100%Confidence score: 100%Supportcopyright@researchgate.net98%Confidence score: 98%legaljobs@researchgate.net98%Confidence score: 98%hrpress@researchgate.net96%Confidence score: 96%communicationcareers@researchgate.net95%Confidence score: 95%hr
-
ResearchGate addressChausseestr. 20, Berlin, 10115, Germany
-
ResearchGate social media
-
Checked and verified by Janet This contact information is personally checked and verified by the ComplaintsBoard representative. Learn moreJun 13, 2024
- View all ResearchGate contacts
Recent comments about ResearchGate company
Metrics fraud on researchgateOur Commitment
We make sure all complaints and reviews are from real people sharing genuine experiences.
We offer easy tools for businesses and reviewers to solve issues together. Learn how it works.
We support and promote the right for reviewers to express their opinions and ideas freely without censorship or restrictions, as long as it's respectful and within our Terms and Conditions, of course ;)
Our rating system is open and honest, ensuring unbiased evaluations for all businesses on the platform. Learn more.
Personal details of reviewers are strictly confidential and hidden from everyone.
Our website is designed to be user-friendly, accessible, and absolutely free for everyone to use.